Search Results for "Excepted Matter"

299 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings of Fact Are Final and Not Re-Examinable Under Section 34.

The petitioners, Dr. Dhiren Lalit Shah and others, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitrator's Awards in Charterparty Dispute. Court Confirms That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Are Not Open to Reappraisal Under Section 34.

The Petitioner, Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF), a public sector company, entered into an Agreement of Affreightment with the Respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award on Repairs and Interest. The court upheld the Single Judge's order setting aside findings on repairs as perverse and reduced interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd against an order of the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Works Contract Enforced Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, a registered government contractor, was awarded a contract by the respondent, the General Manager of South Central Railway, for extensi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Compensation Appeal Despite Prior Motor Accident Claim. Section 167 of Motor Vehicles Act Does Not Bar Claim Under Workmen's Compensation Act When Claimant Elects One Forum and Later Seeks Higher Compensation Under Different Act.

The appellant, Narayan Chokhoba Waghbhije, was a driver employed by respondent no.1, Sangita Gharat, who owned a truck insured with respondent no.2, T...