Search Results for "Electricity Supply"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Electricity Supply"

1267 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1267 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

27 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Electricity Supply Dispute — Holds that Disputes Between Licensees Fall Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of State Electricity Regulatory Commission Under Section 86(1)(f) of Electricity Act, 2003. The court interpreted the word 'and' in Section 86(1)(f) disjunctively, covering disputes between licensees inter se, and rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as the civil suit was barred.

28 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL), a distribution licensee, filed a civil suit for damages against defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Electricity Company Against Rejection of Plaint — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Section 145 of Electricity Act, 2003. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Theft of Electricity Cannot Be Decided Summarily, and Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

7 Feb 2023

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the Maharashtra State Electricity Parashan Company Limited (MSEDCL) against an order of the learne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Against Decree Declaring Demand Letter Illegal. Court Holds That Dispute Regarding Meter Accuracy Must Be Referred to Electrical Inspector Under Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, and Civil Suit Is Not Maintainable.

20 Sep 2013

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (Board) appealed against a decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan, which declared a demand ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

18 Feb 2022

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Enhanced Demand in Electricity Theft Case — Appellate Authority Cannot Enhance Contract Demand Without Cross-Objection. Maximum demand for electricity charges cannot be increased by appellate authority in absence of cross-objection by the board under the Electricity Act, 2003.

26 Mar 2018

The petitioner, M/s Ravi Steel Industries, a partnership firm, challenged two appellate orders passed by the Appellate Authority (respondent No.2) und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Electricity Bill Disconnection for Non-Payment. Held that the Electricity Ombudsman's order directing payment of arrears before reconnection was valid and within jurisdiction under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Mr. Awadesh S. Pandey, a proprietor of Sunshine Plastic Industries, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Case — Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 Not Applicable to Pre-2003 Dues. The Court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not apply to arrears that accrued before the Act came into force, as the Act is not retrospective.

4 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute between the Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (appellant), a state electricity distribution util...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking Compensation for Electricity-Related Losses Against BESCOM — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical faults and transformer failures rejected as no evidence of negligence or breach of duty by the electricity supply company was provided.

16 Oct 2017

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by individuals against the Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM) and others, seeking compe...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)