Search Results for "Developer's Right"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Developer's Right"

548 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 548 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in TDR Case — Principle of Land Division Proportionate to Built-Up Area Applicable When TDR Distributed Across Layout. The Court set aside the Competent Authority's order granting conveyance of 929.84 sq.mtrs and remanded for fresh consideration under Section 11(3) of MOFA, holding that GR dated 22 June 2018 does not mandate conveyance of only plinth and appurtenant area.

25 Jun 2026

The Petitioner, Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Private Limited, is a developer of a large integrated project named 'Neelkanth Greens' at Majiwada...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Criminal Proceedings in Land Fraud Case Under IPC and CrPC. High Court's quashing of FIR set aside as allegations of fraud, forgery, and cheating disclosed cognizable offences requiring investigation, irrespective of civil remedies under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

13 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court heard connected criminal appeals arising from special leave petitions challenging a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court that...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

24 Feb 2026

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

4 Mar 2025

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

26 Aug 2024

The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Seeking Appointment of Receiver and Injunction Against Society Members in Redevelopment Dispute. Court holds that disputes regarding entitlement to alternate accommodation and possession are not arbitrable under the Development Agreement and that the remedy lies before the Cooperative Court under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

3 May 2019

The petitioner, Kamla Homes and Lifestyle Private Limited, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Property Under Development Agreement Held to Occur in Assessment Year 2001-02, Not 2002-03. The Court ruled that the transfer of possession and part performance under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 triggered capital gains tax under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the year of the development agreement, reversing the Tribunal's finding.

17 Jan 2018

The case involves two appeals by Dr. Joao Souza Proenca and Ms. Sara Proenca, husband and wife, against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver to Take Possession of Tenements for Redevelopment Despite Non-Signatory Members' Objection. Non-cooperating members bound by society's development agreement; Court Receiver appointed to facilitate redevelopment of dilapidated building.

22 Dec 2016

The petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging City Civil Court Jurisdiction in Tenant Eviction Suit. Agreement for Sale and Power of Attorney Do Not Create Landlord-Tenant Relationship Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947, Section 28.

15 Dec 2005

The present writ petition challenged an order dated 9.8.2005 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay, on a preliminary issue of jurisdiction in L.C. Su...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)