Search Results for "DRI officers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "DRI officers"

98 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.

11 Jan 2018

The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Bank Guarantee Condition for Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act — Instructions of CBEC Require Bank Guarantee Not to Exceed Twice the Duty Amount. The court directed reduction of bank guarantee from Rs.1.81 crores to twice the duty amount for provisional release of goods under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962.

11 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Bhavik K. Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC to Quash Rejection of Surety in Murder Case. Court Directs Acceptance of Surety and Release of Accused Despite Non-Local Surety Objection.

7 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Sunil Kamble, was accused No.1 in Crime No.55/2021 registered at Mahagaon Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 302 an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Second Buyer of Imported Car, Sets Aside Duty Demand and Penalty. The Court held that once confiscation of a vehicle becomes final due to non-exercise of the redemption option, no customs duty can be demanded from a subsequent purchaser and no penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is sustainable.

30 Apr 2019

The appeal was filed by Gagandeep Singh Anand under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 28 July 2017 of the Customs, Exc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holding That Appeal Against CESTAT Order on Exemption Notification Conditions Lies Before High Court Under Section 130 Customs Act. The dispute over unutilized duty-free imported materials after cessation of manufacturing does not involve determination of rate of duty or value of goods for assessment, thus High Court has jurisdiction.

1 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore-1 (appellant) and M/s Motorola India Ltd. (respondent) regarding the proper...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Grants Assessee Eight Weeks to Prefer CESTAT Appeal Against Customs Order-in-Original Following Supreme Court Review on DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. DRI Officers Are Proper Officers Under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, and Section 97 of the Finance Act, 2022 Retrospectively Validates Show Cause Notices, Leading to Restoration of Appeal Remedy Instead of Quashing the Order.

22 Jul 2025

The petitioner, a private limited company, approached the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in its civil appellate jurisdiction under Article 226 of ...

8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)