Search Results for "Confiscation proceedings"

284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing MPID Act Attachment Against Corporate Debtor's Property. Section 32A IBC Overrides MPID Act as Property Acquired Prior to Offence and Corporate Debtor Not Accused.

The petitioner, Dwarka Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd., as the Successful Resolution Applicant of the corporate debtor M/s. Abhirama Steels Limited, filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Petition for Interim Custody of Seized Tractor Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. — Rejection by Lower Courts Set Aside. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Release Pending Investigation Subject to Conditions to Prevent Deterioration.

The petitioner, Vithoba S/o Shantappa Prachandi, is the owner of a tractor bearing registration No.KA-28-NT-019388/2016-17, which was seized by the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enforcement Committee Decision in Textile Quota Fraud Case. Petitioner Found to Have Forged Visas and Fabricated Bank Realisation Certificates to Obtain Premium Quota.

The petitioner, M/s. Minar Exports, challenged a decision of the Enforcement Committee constituted under a notification dated 12 November 1999 by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Customs for Wrongful Sale of Goods Held by Court Receiver. Plaintiff entitled to refund of purchase price paid to Court Receiver for goods that could not be delivered due to prior sale by Customs.

The suit was filed by M & H Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) against the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay (Defendant No.1) and the Commissioner of ...