High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Petition for Interim Custody of Seized Tractor Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. — Rejection by Lower Courts Set Aside. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Release Pending Investigation Subject to Conditions to Prevent Deterioration.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vithoba S/o Shantappa Prachandi, is the owner of a tractor bearing registration No.KA-28-NT-019388/2016-17, which was seized by the Indi Police in connection with Crime No.9/2017 on 14.01.2017 based on credible information. The petitioner filed an application under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the learned JMFC, Indi, seeking interim custody of the tractor. The JMFC rejected the application on 16.2.2017. The petitioner then filed a criminal revision petition before the Principal Sessions Judge, Vijayapura, which was also dismissed on 7.3.2017. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying for a writ of certiorari to set aside both orders and for release of the tractor. The High Court, after hearing the parties, observed that the vehicle was not required for further investigation and that keeping it in police custody would lead to deterioration. The court held that the owner is entitled to interim custody subject to conditions. Accordingly, the petition was allowed, the impugned orders were set aside, and the JMFC was directed to release the tractor to the petitioner on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.5,00,000/- with two sureties, an undertaking not to alienate or alter the vehicle, and to produce it as and when required.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Interim Custody of Seized Property - Section 457 Cr.P.C. - Release of Vehicle to Owner - The petitioner, owner of a tractor seized in Crime No.9/2017, filed an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. for interim custody, which was rejected by the JMFC and confirmed by the Sessions Judge. The High Court held that the owner is entitled to custody of the vehicle subject to conditions, as the vehicle is not required for further investigation and is likely to deteriorate if kept in police custody. The court allowed the petition and directed release of the tractor on furnishing a bond and undertaking. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner-owner of a seized tractor is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, pending investigation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the orders dated 16.2.2017 and 7.3.2017, and directed the JMFC, Indi to release the tractor to the petitioner on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.5,00,000/- with two sureties, an undertaking not to alienate or alter the vehicle, and to produce it as and when required.

Law Points

  • Interim custody of vehicle
  • Section 457 Cr.P.C.
  • Release of seized property
  • Owner's entitlement
  • Conditions for release
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (06) 1

Writ Petition No.201598/2017 (GM-RES)

2017-06-06

B. A. Patil

Mahadev S. Patil (for petitioner), Maqbool Ahmed (HCGP for respondent)

Vithoba S/o Shantappa Prachandi

The State of Karnataka, Through Indi Police Station

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking interim custody of a seized tractor.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to set aside orders rejecting his application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. and for release of the tractor.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's application for interim custody of his tractor was rejected by the JMFC and confirmed by the Sessions Judge.

Previous Decisions

JMFC, Indi rejected the application on 16.2.2017; Principal Sessions Judge, Vijayapura dismissed the revision on 7.3.2017.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim custody of the seized tractor under Section 457 Cr.P.C.?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is the owner and the vehicle is not required for investigation; its continued custody would cause deterioration. Respondent opposed the release, but the court found no compelling reason to deny custody.

Ratio Decidendi

The owner of a seized vehicle is entitled to interim custody under Section 457 Cr.P.C. if the vehicle is not required for further investigation and its continued police custody may lead to deterioration. Release is subject to conditions to ensure its production when needed.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner-owner of Tractor bearing Reg.No.KA-28-NT-019388/2016-17... The brief facts are that; on 14.01.2017 on credible information respondent-police went to the spot and intercepted the Tractor... The petitioner filed an application under Section 457 of Cr.P.C. for release of the vehicle... The learned JMFC rejected the application... The revision petition was also dismissed... Hence, the present petition.

Procedural History

The petitioner's tractor was seized on 14.01.2017 in Crime No.9/2017. He filed an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. before JMFC, Indi, which was rejected on 16.2.2017. He then filed Crl.R.P.No.45/2017 before the Principal Sessions Judge, Vijayapura, which was dismissed on 7.3.2017. Thereafter, he filed the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 457, 482
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Petition for Interim Custody of Seized Tractor Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. — Rejection by Lower Courts Set Aside. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Release Pending Investigation Subject to Conditions to Prevent Deterior...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal Against Review Order Permitting Tenant to Amend Written Statement in Rent Suit. Amendment Sought After Trial Decree and After Rejection of Earlier Amendment Application, Not Allowed as It Would Circumvent Fi...