Gujarat High Court Orders Release of Seized Goods and Defreezing of Bank Accounts Under GST Act After Expiry of One-Year Limitation Period. The court held that provisional attachment under Section 83(2) and seizure under Section 67(7) of the GST Act cannot continue beyond one year, directing the state to release goods and defreeze accounts.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in trading gold, silver, diamonds, and jewellery, had its premises searched on 09.03.2022 under Section 67(2) of the GST Act. On 10.03.2022, the respondent issued an order of provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts with HDFC Bank and SBI Bank in Form GST DRC-22. During the search on 14.03.2022, gold, silver, and cash were seized under Form GST INS-02. The petitioner contended that more than 20 months had elapsed since the seizure and attachment, and despite requests dated 06.09.2023, 05.10.2023, and 17.10.2023, the respondents failed to release the goods or defreeze the accounts. The petitioner approached the High Court seeking release of seized goods and vacation of the provisional attachment. The court considered the provisions of Section 83(2) and Section 67(7) of the GST Act, which impose a one-year limitation on provisional attachment and retention of seized goods. The court held that the continued attachment and retention beyond one year are illegal and directed the respondents to defreeze the bank accounts and release the seized goods within two weeks. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Goods and Services Tax - Provisional Attachment - Section 83(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Limitation Period - The provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section 83(2) ceases to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date of attachment - The court held that the continued attachment beyond one year is illegal and directed the respondents to defreeze the bank accounts (Paras 3-6).

B) Goods and Services Tax - Seizure of Goods - Section 67(7) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Release of Seized Goods - The seizure of goods under Section 67(2) cannot continue beyond one year as per Section 67(7) - The court held that the respondents must release the seized gold, silver, and cash within two weeks (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the continued provisional attachment of bank accounts and retention of seized goods beyond one year under the GST Act is valid

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to defreeze the bank accounts and release the seized gold, silver, and cash within two weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Provisional attachment under Section 83(2) of GST Act ceases after one year
  • Seized goods must be released after one year under Section 67(7) of GST Act
  • Limitation period for retention of seized goods is one year
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:2462-DB

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.21039 of 2023

2026-01-09

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:2462-DB

Avinash Poddar, Anchal A Poddar, Harshvardhan Sharma

M/S Reevan Creation

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking release of seized goods and vacation of provisional attachment under GST Act

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents to release seized gold, silver, and cash, and to defreeze bank accounts

Filing Reason

Respondents failed to release seized goods and defreeze bank accounts despite expiry of one-year limitation period under GST Act

Issues

Whether the provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section 83(2) of GST Act can continue beyond one year Whether the retention of seized goods under Section 67(7) of GST Act beyond one year is valid

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that under Section 83(2) of GST Act, provisional attachment ceases after one year, and under Section 67(7), seized goods must be released after one year Respondents initially sought time to verify limitation period but did not oppose the petition on merits

Ratio Decidendi

The provisional attachment under Section 83(2) and seizure under Section 67(7) of the GST Act are limited to one year; after expiry, the attachment must be lifted and goods released.

Judgment Excerpts

The matter was today specifically kept on the request of learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Harshvardhan Sharma to verify with regard to the limitation period as provided under Section 83 (2) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 of one year having been expired and as regards to release of seized articles / goods of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that since more than 20 months have elapsed on 29.09.2023, the goods of the petitioner were not released despite the maximum period of one year being over.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 29.09.2023 after the respondents failed to respond to requests for release of goods and defreezing of accounts. The court heard the matter and passed judgment on 09.01.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 67(2), Section 67(7), Section 83(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Orders Release of Seized Goods and Defreezing of Bank Accounts Under GST Act After Expiry of One-Year Limitation Period. The court held that provisional attachment under Section 83(2) and seizure under Section 67(7) of the GST Act ...
Related Judgement
High Court Conditional Guarantee Found Inoperative in Absence of CDR Approval. No life to a contract where pre-conditions remain unmet, rules Bombay High Court.