Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

2986 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2986 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Railways Act Case Regarding Sufficiency of Notice Under Section 77. The Court ruled that the requirement of notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, should be liberally construed and notice addressed to the Chief Commercial Manager (Claims and Refunds) was valid compliance.

7 Mar 1968

The dispute arose from a contract for carriage of goods by rail. The appellant, a consignor, booked goods for transportation from Sealdah station via ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay considered defendant's leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery based on dishonoured cheques. Preliminary objection that suit was barred under Section 13(1) of Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 rejected because Section 2(13)(j) excludes advances above Rs 3 lakhs made on negotiable instrument other than promissory note; extract ended before final disposition.

16 Feb 2021

The judgment under consideration is a summons for judgment in a commercial summary suit before the High Court of Bombay. The plaintiff, a lender, soug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Change of User from Residential to Commercial. Tenant's Use of Premises for Storing Cloth Packages and Business Constitutes Change of User Under Rent Control Legislation.

18 Mar 2013

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment Application by ITC in Copyright and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Claims Not Frivolous or Vexatious, Require Trial. The court held that the test for summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC is stringent and that triable issues existed regarding copyright subsistence and passing off.

11 Jan 2022

The present Interim Application was filed by the Defendant, Indian Tobacco Company (ITC), seeking dismissal of the Plaintiff's claims for copyright in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

11 Mar 2020

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.

2 Feb 2025

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land. The court held that the petitioner had no legal right to the land and the demolition order was valid under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

6 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Manish Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order dated 6th October 2010 passed by the Deputy Chief Eng...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)