Search Results for "Bombay Town Planning Act"

1134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Decrees Declaring Lapse of Land Reservation. Issues of Lapsing Under Section 127 of MRTP Act and Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 149 Argued.

This second appeal arose from concurrent judgments and decrees of lower courts declaring that the reservation on the suit property, owned by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Hotel Construction Under MRTP Act. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid building permission and previous Division Bench upholding notice under Section 53(1) of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 leads to dismissal.

The petitioner, Satish D. Darekar, was served with a notice under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Petitioner's land reserved as 'Mela Ground' in Development Plan of 2004 not acquired within statutory period, resulting in deemed lapsing of reservation.

The petitioner, Sunil Mallikarjun Patil, is the owner of land bearing survey no. 40/1/B, out of which 0.52 hectares from survey no. 40 (Part), Shelgi,...