Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

315 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Un-Executed Conveyance Deed Due to Vendor Fraud. Limitation Period for Application Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Runs from Date of Instrument, Not from Date of Cancellation Deed.

17 May 2024

The appellant, a bona fide purchaser, agreed to buy property from Mohammed Hanif Ahmed Fitwala and prepared a conveyance deed. On 7 May 2014, the deed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Arbitral Award Passed Outside State — Stamp Duty Payable Only Where Award is Made Under Section 3 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral Award Made in Mumbai Not Subject to Karnataka Stamp Duty When Sought to be Executed in Karnataka.

23 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd, a financial institution, entered into a loan agreement with respondents No. 1 and 2. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Penalty Case — No New Fact or Error Apparent on Record. Review sought on grounds of discovery of subsequent sale and excessive penalty, but court finds no due diligence or error apparent.

29 Sep 2006

The applicants, original petitioners in Writ Petition No.7410 of 2002, filed a Review Petition No.64 of 2003 seeking review of an order dated 29th Jan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

4 Oct 2016

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013

1 Oct 2014

The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Loan Based on Promissory Note — Stamp Duty Deficiency Not Fatal to Admissibility of Document for Collateral Purpose. The court held that an insufficiently stamped promissory note can be admitted for collateral purpose under Section 35 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC solely on that ground.

24 Feb 2015

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 15,00,000 with interest against the respondent-defendant, who is his sister-in-law. The plain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Unstamped Agreement to Sell Does Not Justify Rejection Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Court Holds That Question of Stamp Duty Is a Preliminary Issue Under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC, Not a Ground for Rejection of Plaint.

11 Apr 2022

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a Special Civil Suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.08.2011. The respondent/def...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rule 18 of Capital Value Rules for Exceeding Delegated Authority Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Commissioner's Power to Frame Rules Under Section 154(1B) Does Not Extend to Imposing Additional Tax Liability Beyond the Act's Framework.

20 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Aegis Logistics Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 18 of the ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears challenge to constitutional validity of explanation inserted into Sections 65(105)(zzq) and 65(105)(zzzh) and clause (zzzzu) of the Finance Act 1994 by the Finance Act 2010. The impugned provisions deem construction services provided by a builder to a buyer in case of a new building intended for sale as a taxable service and bring preferential location charges within the service tax net.

19 Jan 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions introduced by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Conditions Imposed by Competent Authority in Deemed Conveyance, Directs Fresh Inquiry on Area. Competent Authority's Jurisdiction Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is Limited to Statutory Inquiry and Cannot Impose Extraneous Conditions Like Indemnity Bond or Architect Certificate.

24 Jan 2014

The petitioner, a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Compe...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)