Search Results for "Article 13(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Article 13(2)"

980 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 980 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Drop Witnesses and Array Them as Accused in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case. Court Holds That Power Under Section 319 CrPC Is Discretionary and Cannot Be Invoked by an Accused at Trial Stage Without Evidence.

28 Mar 2016

The applicant, a senior IPS officer and accused No. 2 in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Court...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Fitness Certificate to Appeal to Supreme Court in Income Tax Case - No Substantial Question of Law of General Importance Involved. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any substantial question of law of general importance warranting a certificate under Article 133 of the Constitution.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Ryatar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit, filed a Miscellaneous Petition under Order 45 Rule 2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking a 'Fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

27 Feb 2023

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Non-Application of Mind. Notice Issued Based on Search Materials Without Independent Satisfaction or Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Dilipbhai Prabhudas Patel, an individual and part of the PSY Group engaged in real estate business, filed his return of income for Ass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award in Irrigation Project — No Arbitrariness Found in Relaxation of Eligibility Criteria. Court held that tender conditions are not statutory and can be relaxed if not essential, and that the petitioner failed to establish mala fides or arbitrariness.

25 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Kailash Constructions, challenged the award of a tender by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) to respondent no. 5,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of ITAT Appeals from Bangalore to Mumbai Bench for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. President of ITAT Cannot Delegate Power to Transfer Cases to a Bench; Speaking Order by Bangalore Bench Exceeded Authority Under Section 255(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

21 May 2021

The petitioner, MSPL Limited, challenged two orders: (1) a speaking order dated 19.03.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Limitation Issue Regarding Temple Property Alienations. High Court had applied Art. 134-B of Limitation Act, 1908 and rejected adverse possession claim since alienor was alive.

16 Dec 1965

The dispute concerned lands granted in inam to a temple. By 1929, the manager of the temple had sold all the properties through various sale deeds and...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)