Search Results for "voidable agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "voidable agreement"

303 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Vendor's Appeal, Dismisses Vendee's Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Payment of Rent. Payment of Customary Rent Held an Essential Term of Contract, Non-Performance Bars Discretionary Relief Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

11 Sep 2019

The case involves an agreement to sell dated 13.05.1964 between Mohinder Kaur (vendor) and Bahadur Singh (vendee) for sale of land for Rs.5605/-, with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application Seeking Ratification of Sale Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 — Court Ratifies Sale of Property by Company in Liquidation to Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Winding Up Petition.

10 Jun 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed an interim application filed by the applicant seeking a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 was...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Binding on Owner as Attorney Exceeded Authority. Court holds that a power of attorney must be strictly construed and the attorney cannot bind the principal beyond the express terms of the power, setting aside the decree for specific performance.

15 Jan 2013

The 1st respondent, R. Krishnamurthy, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell property No.1236, 3rd Cross, I Block, HAL III Stag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Decree of Specific Performance in Land Sale Agreement Case. Concurrent Findings of Fact Establish Genuine Agreement to Sell with Full Consideration and Possession, No Discretion to Refuse Specific Performance Under Section 20(2)(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

26 Sep 2019

The original appellant, Leeladhar, entered into a registered agreement to sell 18 bighas of land to Deshraj for Rs.40,000 on 15.02.1985, receiving Rs....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Time Was Essence of Contract; Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld. Breach by Buyer in Agreements to Sell Land in Gurgaon Leads to Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance and Refund of Earnest Money.

11 Feb 2022

The case involves a dispute over two agreements to sell agricultural land in Gurgaon, executed on 17.02.2004, between the appellants (sellers) and the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Validates Property Transactions Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 Despite Winding-Up Order — Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice. Court Holds That Post-Petition Dispositions Can Be Validated If Made in Ordinary Course of Business and for Adequate Consideration, Directing Sale Proceeds to Be Deposited With Official Liquidator.

4 May 2026

The case involves an Interim Application filed by M.M. Styles Private Limited seeking validation of two property transactions under Section 536(2) of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Executability of Compromise Decree in Eviction Suit under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court considers whether a compromise that does not refer to specific eviction grounds creates a fresh tenancy requiring new proceedings.

27 Jul 2022

The respondent-landlord filed a suit against the petitioner-tenants seeking eviction under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) and (g) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Recall and Review Applications in Bank Loan Assignment Case — Consent Order Recorded on Minutes of Order Cannot Be Unilaterally Recalled. Assignment of Debt and Security by Co-operative Bank to Third Party Under OTS Upheld Despite Subsequent Objections by Liquidator and Suspended Director.

11 Mar 2025

The judgment concerns three applications seeking recall or review of an order dated 21 October 2022 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute Based on Signed ISDA Agreement. Court Finds No Ground to Interfere Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Arbitrator's Findings on Enforceability Are Reasonable.

6 Jul 2012

The dispute arose from two foreign exchange derivative transactions entered into between Sporting India Limited (the Petitioner) and HDFC Bank Limited...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)