Search Results for "vehicle control"

1190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim for Damages to Car. Owner of Vehicle is Competent to Maintain Claim Petition Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Even if Not the Registered Owner.

The appellant, Sri Hemanth Raju, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Owner's Appeal in Vicarious Liability Case Due to Lack of Employer Authorization. Unauthorized Driver Taking License Test Not Acting Within Course of Employment Absolves Owner from Liability Under Tort Law.

The dispute arose from a personal injury caused by a motor vehicle accident. The respondent, Santanuprasad Jaishankar Bhatt, was injured when a taxi o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Insurance Company Held Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. Owner Not Liable to Pay Compensation as Vehicle Was Driven by Authorized Driver with Valid License.

The appeal was filed by the owner of the offending vehicle, Moinuddin, against the judgment and award dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...