Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "toll road"
163 result(s) found
Found 163 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bus Operators' Challenge to RTO Circular on Contract Carriage Permits — Circular Held Valid as Clarificatory and Not Imposing New Conditions. The court held that the impugned circular dated 19.02.2025 is merely clarificatory and does not impose any new conditions beyond those under Section 74 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
2 Jun 2025The petitioners, an association of bus operators and individual bus operators holding contract carriage permits under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ch...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.
23 Sep 2021The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...
- 302
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.
6 Nov 2020The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application for Appointment of Receiver in BOT Road Contract Dispute. The court held that the appellant contractor had a prima facie case and was entitled to appointment of a receiver to collect tolls pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Nov 2013The appellant, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., a construction company, entered into a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract with the State of Maharashtra for im...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Road Tender and Concession Period. Policy decisions regarding toll collection and concession periods are not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.
4 Sep 2013The petitioner, Nandu Sambaji Nagarkar, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging th...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Dispute — Compensation Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Court holds that the Arbitral Tribunal cannot award compensation beyond the Reference Court's award without proper evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two cross-petitions arising out of an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning compensation for l...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tender Cancellation in Public Works Contract. Court Holds That No Vested Right Arises Until Formal Acceptance of Bid, and Government Has Discretion to Cancel Tender in Public Interest.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, Jai Laxmi Constructions and others, filed two writ petitions challenging the cancellation of a tender process and the issuance of a f...
- 116
