Search Results for "ticket evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "ticket evidence"

297 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Family of Deceased Passenger in Railway Accident Case. Death of a bonafide passenger due to being knocked down by a train while crossing tracks between stations constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the absence of a ticket on the body does not negate bonafide passenger status.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal filed by the original applicants (the family of the deceased) against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Deceased Passenger in Railways Act Case — Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Missing Ticket. The Court held that circumstantial evidence, including police inquest report and witness testimony, can prove passenger status under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Lata, wife of the deceased Chandrakant Thakkar, filed a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989 after her husband fell from...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railway Accident Case — Non-Recovery of Ticket Not Fatal to Claim if Prima Facie Proof of Bona Fide Passenger Exists. The Court held that once claimants produce prima facie evidence of ticket purchase, burden shifts to Railways to disprove it under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.

1 Jan 2025

The appeal arose from the death of Sanjesh Kumar Yagnik, who allegedly fell from a running train (Ranthambore Express) on 19.05.2017 due to overcrowdi...

High Court

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

20 Jun 2024

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a passenger due to accidental fall from train is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is liable to pay compensation regardless of negligence.

10 Jul 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, the widow and children of the deceased Ramlu Renalwar, challenging the judgment and award of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor in MSRTC Ticketless Travel Case — Reinstatement Set Aside as Punishment Not Disproportionate. The court held that the Industrial Court's revisional order restoring dismissal was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

27 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Mahadeo Shripati Khot, was a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since December 1988. On 31...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Trademark Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Business Activities in Mumbai Confer Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case that part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court, and the defendants failed to discharge the burden of proving that the leave was improperly granted.

12 Jul 2017

The plaintiff, M/s Black Ticket Films, a registered partnership firm based in New Delhi, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court against two defendants ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Deceased Vendor's Family — Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration failed to prove the exception of self-inflicted injury, and the death of a passenger selling articles in a train is an untoward incident attracting strict liability.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Railway Clai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Deceased a Bonafide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 does not require strict proof of ticket purchase; presumption of bonafide passenger arises from credible oral testimony and surrounding circumstances.

20 Jun 2017

The appellants, parents and minor brother of deceased Ravi, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)