Search Results for "stamp duty refund"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Valuation Dispute Remanded for Fresh Adjudication After Finding That Show-Cause Notice Was Not Served and Opportunity of Hearing Was Denied.

The petitioner, Armstrong Machine Builders Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...