Search Results for "sick industrial unit"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Recovery of Excise Duty from Sick Industrial Company Without BIFR Consent. The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA bars coercive recovery of dues without prior consent of BIFR, protecting the petitioner-company's assets.

The petitioner, Polymermann (ASIA) P. Ltd., is an industrial unit engaged in the manufacture of polymer chemicals, with its factory at MIDC, Ambad, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection of Sick Industrial Company. Government's Communication to MSEDCL to Disconnect Supply Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Contrary to BIFR Directions.

The petitioner, Goradia Special Steels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, is a sick industrial company registered with the Boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Closure Permission for Textile Mills Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act. The Court Stresses Need for Genuine and Adequate Grounds and Balances Industrial Needs with Worker Welfare, While Exercising Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute arose from the closure of two textile establishments, the Crown Mills Division and Process House Unit of Hindustan Spinning and Weaving Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Customs Dispute. BIFR Scheme Binding on Government Departments; Pre-Deposit Condition Quashed for Sick Industrial Company Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director General o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Quashes Pre-deposit Order in Customs Dispute. Merger of Sick Company with Petitioner Under SICA Extinguishes Pre-deposit Liability, and Revenue Authorities Are Bound by the BIFR Scheme.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practice Orders — Industrial Court's Findings Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer Denied Salary and Benefits to Employees During Strike Period, Constituting Unfair Labour Practices Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

The petitioners, National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited and its General Manager, challenged two orders of the Industrial Court at Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...