Search Results for "refund processing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "refund processing"

240 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

14 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Processing of Income Tax Return and Refund Under Section 143(1) Despite Pending Scrutiny Under Section 143(2) — CBDT Instruction No.1 of 2015 Quashed. The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot withhold refund merely because a scrutiny notice has been issued, as the provisions of Section 143(1) and 143(1D) are mandatory and independent of Section 143(2).

15 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the inaction of ...

Supreme Court

Non-Compliance with Section 38(3)(a)(ii) Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, : Unjustified Retention of Refund Amounts

1 May 2024

Examining the violation of refund processing timeline and the implications on the adjustment of default notices. The case revolves around the issue o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

21 May 2021

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Adjustment of Refund Without Notice Under Section 245 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Refund for Assessment Year 2008-09 Adjusted Against Alleged Demands for 2014-15 and 2015-16 Without Prior Intimation to Assessee.

18 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Greatship (India) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the action of respondent No.2 (Centralised Processing Centre) in adjustin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Recovery in Income Tax Stay Matter — Petitioner Voluntarily Paid 20% Demand, Revenue Adjusted Refund Beyond Permitted Limit. Adjustment of Refund Against Stayed Demand Violates Instruction No.1914 and Stay Order Dated 17 April 2024.

24 Feb 2025

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2015-2016 on 28 September 2015, declaring income of Rs.56,65,660/-. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Royalty Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007 — Limitation Circular of 2011 Held Applicable to Claims Filed After Its Issuance. The court upheld the rejection of a claim for refund of royalty for the year 2011-2012 as time-barred under a government circular dated 17.06.2011, even though the eligibility certificate was issued earlier.

7 Apr 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Chinteshwar Steel Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Customs Refund. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund order.

16 Sep 2016

The Petitioner, Shelf Drilling International Inc. (formerly Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Challenging Joint Application Requirement for Refund of Court Fees in DRT — Rule 5 of Refund Rules Struck Down as Ultra Vires. The requirement of a joint application by the applicant and defendant for refund of court fees was held arbitrary and beyond the rule-making power under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

9 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Yes Bank Limited, a bank governed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, had advanced a loan to a borrower who defaulted. The bank filed...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)