Search Results for "redevelopment permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "redevelopment permission"

423 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 423 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Co-operative Housing Society in CRZ-II Area Without Prior CRZ Clearance Under 2011 Notification — Stop Work Notice Quashed. The court held that para 8(iii) of the CRZ Notification 2011 permits redevelopment of existing authorized buildings in CRZ-II areas without prior CRZ clearance, and the stop work notice issued by MCZMA was invalid.

3 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Sea Green Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is the lessee of land admeasuring approximately 1,672 sq. mtrs. in Worli, Mumbai, which f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Government Resolution Paragraph 12 Does Not Require Consent of All Tenants for Redevelopment Scheme. The Court held that the requirement of consent under paragraph 12 of the Government Resolution dated 3rd December, 2001 is not a condition precedent for the grant of permission for redevelopment and that the authorities must consider the application on merits.

18 Jul 2014

The petitioners, tenants of a building known as Bori Chawl situated at Ram Tekdi Road, Sewri, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

8 Dec 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

23 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

4 May 2023

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Challenge to Cancellation of NOC for Redevelopment Due to Misrepresentation of Tenant Status. Landlord's Failure to Disclose Correct Residential Status of Tenants Renders Permission Void Ab Initio Under DCR 33(7) and MHADA Act.

21 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Dahyabhai Papers & Boards Pvt. Ltd. and another, owned a dilapidated cessed building in Mumbai. They applied for redevelopment under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

20 Mar 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)