Search Results for "promotion affected"

711 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 711 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Union’s Appeal in CISF Officer’s Disciplinary Matter; Directs Reconsideration of Minor Penalty After Finding Violation of Natural Justice Not Made Out

The appeal arose against a single judge’s order dated 23.08.2023 in W.P.No.9102/2022, setting aside a minor penalty imposed on the respondent, a Dep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Policy for Air Vice Marshal Based on Seniority-cum-Merit. Air Commodore's Challenge Dismissed as Policy Valid and No Right to Promotion.

The appellant, Air Commodore Naveen Jain, was commissioned in the Indian Air Force in 1981 and promoted to Air Commodore in 2011. He was considered fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion to Branch Manager in Shabari Tribal Financial Development Corporation Ltd. — Held that Petitioner's Candidature for Promotion to Class-I Post Must Be Considered as Per Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, Shridhar Sambhaji Dhale, possessed a Master's degree in Commerce and joined as Junior Assistant in 1979 with the Maharashtra State Co-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CAT Order Denying Promotion from 2010. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 22 November 2010 rejected as he was not eligible on that date.

The petitioner, Chandrakant C. Mishra, a Tax Assistant (Group C) aged 61, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Setting Aside Cancellation of Promotion and Withdrawal of ACP Benefits. Employer's Action of Cancelling Promotion Without Hearing Employee Held to be Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran and another, challenged the order dated 12/10/2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Rajasthan State Sports Council in Promotion Dispute. Held that promotion criteria applicable as on date of consideration, not vacancy year, under Rule 9(4) of Rajasthan State Sports Council Service Rules, 2006.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Sports Officer in the Rajasthan State Sports Council. Respondent No. 1, Uma Dadhich, was app...