Search Results for "patent illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI Appeal, Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act. Arbitrator's Reliance on Single Sale Deed of Dissimilar Land Held Contrary to Section 26(1)(b) of Right to Fair Compensation Act.

12 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Be...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Arbitrator's Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy. Court holds that Section 34 petition under Arbitration Act cannot be treated as an appeal on merits and interference is warranted only if award is patently illegal or perverse.

23 Nov 2024

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.

6 Apr 2026

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contractual Terms Are Not Open to Reappreciation in a Section 34 Petition.

2 Apr 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2024 passed b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.

18 Jul 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's award of Rs. 23,00,000/- with interest at 18% per annum, finding no error in the tribunal's interpretation of the hire purchase agreement or assessment of damages.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Aidek Tourism Services Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act — Upholds Arbitral Award Granting Interest on Delayed Payments. Court holds that award of interest at 18% per annum is not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Jul 2016

The case involves an appeal by Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Appellant) against the rejection of its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in CPWD Contract Dispute — Insistence on Specific Brand Violated Competition Act. Court sets aside award that upheld termination for refusal to use Johnson vitrified tiles, holding that insistence on a single brand without allowing equivalent amounted to abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

6 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a Single Judge dismissing the appell...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)