Search Results for "oral interview marks"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "oral interview marks"

159 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Selection Process for Store Keeper Posts Due to Unauthorized Oral Interview — Merit List Ignored in Violation of Government Resolution Dated 19th October, 2007. The court held that the selection process was vitiated as the oral interview was not authorized by the Government Resolution, and the petitioner, who secured the highest marks in the written examination, was entitled to be selected.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Laxman Nikale, filed a writ petition challenging the selection process adopted by Respondent No.1, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Ma...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Regional Rural Bank Promotion Dispute — Prescribing Minimum Qualifying Marks for Interview and Performance Appraisal Not Violative of Seniority-cum-Merit Principle. The Court held that administrative instructions fixing a benchmark of 12 marks each for interview and performance appraisal are permissible under the Regional Rural Banks (Appointment and Promotion of Officers and other Employees) Rules, 1998, and do not defeat the seniority-cum-merit principle.

9 Apr 2019

The dispute arose from promotions to the post of Junior Management Scale II in Mahakoshal Kshetriya Bank, governed by the Regional Rural Banks (Appoin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Selection Process for Assistant Engineer Post in Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Substitution of Skill Test with Interview Violated Advertised Procedure, Court Quashes Selection and Orders Fresh Process.

12 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Rahul Annasaheb Shende, a Civil Engineer with B.Tech qualification, was initially appointed as an Engineer on a contractual basis by T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examined Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Selection Process for Technician Posts — Estoppel and Delay Considered. Selection Process for Project Affected Persons Under Scrutiny for Award of Additional Marks to MSEB Company’s Own Project Affected Persons.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioner, a project affected person (PAP), applied for the post of Technician Class-6 in response to an advertisement issued on 4 December 2017 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 40% Cut-off in Viva-Voce for Judicial Service Recruitment. Rule requiring minimum 40% marks in interview for SC candidates held valid under Article 14.

17 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Vrushali Vilas Kuchekar, an advocate enrolled in 2009 and belonging to the Scheduled Caste, applied for the post of Judicial Magistrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows RTI Petition for Disclosure of Marks of All Candidates in Judicial Recruitment — Holds That Marks in Public Selection Process Are Not Exempt Personal Information Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act. Transparency in public recruitment requires disclosure of marks of all candidates to ensure fairness and public confidence.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Shri Onkar Dattatray Kalmankar, applied for the post of Junior Clerk in the District Court at Pune pursuant to an advertisement issued...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Divisional Commissioner's Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Sevika Selection. Selection Process Conducted Under Government Resolution Dated 05.08.2010 Upheld as Interview Marks Were Not Prohibited at the Time of Selection.

3 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Shilpa Dhanraj Kale, was selected as Anganwadi Sevika based on a recruitment process conducted under Government Resolution dated 05.08...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Police Patil Candidate Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointment Based on Legal Heir Preference. Preference Rule Valid as Tilting Factor Among Equally Qualified Candidates Under Government Gazette Notification.

19 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Dilip Punjaji Kharat, applied for the post of Police Patil pursuant to an advertisement. He claimed entitlement to six additional mark...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Police Constable Appointment Due to Lack of Merit in Selection Process. Petitioner failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in interview and was not entitled to grace marks for sports achievements.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Vijay Balbhim Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

1 Jan 2020

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)