Search Results for "multiplier reduction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "multiplier reduction"

160 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Deceased's Income Assessed from Income Tax Returns, Multiplier Adjusted for Widow's Pension, and Liability Apportioned Between Insurers Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Apr 2010

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalgaon, in MACP No. 245 of 1994, which awarded compensation of Rs.2,14,140 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and Deduction. Tribunal's Award of Rs.8,57,250/- Reduced to Rs.5,36,000/- as Multiplier of 17 for Deceased Aged 50 Years Was Erroneous; Proper Multiplier is 13 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

31 Jan 2014

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 10.08.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.VII, Bijapur in MVC No.2083/2009, awardin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Deduction of Personal Expenses and Multiplier Error. Compensation Reduced from Rs. 17,63,000 to Rs. 10,28,000 as Tribunal Erred in Not Deducting 1/3rd Towards Personal Expenses and Applying Multiplier of 13 Instead of 14 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

21 Mar 2013

The appeal was filed by the insurer, The New India Assurance Co., Ltd., against the judgment and award dated 01/02/2010 passed by the III Additional D...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partially Allows Insurance Appeal and Claimant Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Applied as per Second Schedule of MV Act. The court modified the award by applying the correct multiplier based on the claimant's age, enhancing compensation from Rs.2,97,000 to Rs.3,17,000.

19 Mar 2013

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Limited and a cross-objection by the claimant K.B. Shivakumar Swamy against the judgment...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Claimant's Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Applied as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

19 Mar 2013

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by K.B. Shivakumar Swamy (claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seek...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and No Deduction for Personal Expenses. Insurer's Appeal Partly Allowed as Tribunal Erred in Applying Multiplier 13 Instead of 14 and Failed to Deduct 1/3rd for Personal Expenses Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

21 Mar 2013

The appeal was filed by the insurer, The New India Assurance Co., Ltd., against the judgment and award dated 01/02/2010 passed by the III Additional D...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Claimant's Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Applied as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court modified the multiplier from 15 to 18 for age group 30-35, enhancing compensation from Rs.2,97,000 to Rs.3,42,000.

19 Mar 2013

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Limited and cross-objections by the claimant K.B. Shivakumar Swamy against the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Agricultural Land — Applies Multiplier Method and Considers Potential for Non-Agricultural Use. Court holds that potential value of land for non-agricultural use must be considered and multiplier method is appropriate for determining market value under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola, in Land Acquisition Case No. 53 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Deduction of 50% Towards Personal Expenses for a Bachelor Deceased. Tribunal's award of Rs.19,57,950/- modified to Rs.13,05,300/- with 9% interest per annum.

2 Apr 2019

The appeal was filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 15.07.2016 passed by the Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)