High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and Deduction. Tribunal's Award of Rs.8,57,250/- Reduced to Rs.5,36,000/- as Multiplier of 17 for Deceased Aged 50 Years Was Erroneous; Proper Multiplier is 13 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 10.08.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.VII, Bijapur in MVC No.2083/2009, awarding compensation of Rs.8,57,250/- with interest at 6% p.a. for the death of Ashok Jagati in a motor vehicle accident on 07.11.2008. The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the quantum of compensation. The deceased was aged 50 years and was a driver by profession earning Rs.4,500/- per month. The Tribunal applied a multiplier of 17 and deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses. The High Court held that as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, for a deceased aged 50 years, the multiplier should be 13, and for 5 dependents, the deduction should be 1/4th. The Tribunal also found contributory negligence on the part of the deceased, which was not challenged. Recalculating, the loss of dependency was computed as Rs.4,500 x 12 x 13 x 3/4 = Rs.5,26,500/-. Adding Rs.5,000/- for loss of consortium, Rs.2,000/- for funeral expenses, and Rs.2,500/- for loss of estate, total compensation was reduced to Rs.5,36,000/-. The appeal was partly allowed, reducing the compensation from Rs.8,57,250/- to Rs.5,36,000/- with interest at 6% p.a.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Computation of Compensation - Multiplier - The Tribunal applied multiplier 17 for a deceased aged 50 years, which is contrary to the settled principle that multiplier should be based on the age of the deceased as per Sarla Verma v. DTC. For age 50, the appropriate multiplier is 13. (Para 4)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Computation of Compensation - Deduction for Personal Expenses - The Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses, but as the deceased had 5 dependents, the deduction should be 1/4th as per Sarla Verma. (Para 4)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - The Tribunal found contributory negligence on the part of the deceased, but the Insurance Company did not challenge that finding. Hence, the finding of contributory negligence is not disturbed. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is excessive and requires reduction, particularly regarding the multiplier applied and the deduction for personal expenses.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed; compensation reduced from Rs.8,57,250/- to Rs.5,36,000/- with interest at 6% p.a.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Computation of Compensation
  • Multiplier
  • Deduction for Personal Expenses
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (01) 39

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.30315/2012 (MV)

2014-01-31

A.S. Pachhapure

Sanjay M. Joshi for Appellant, Bapugouda Siddappa for C/R1-R5, S.V. Biradar for R6

The Manager, The National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Smt. Sunanda W/o Ashok Jagati & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against quantum of compensation in a motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Reduction of compensation awarded by the Tribunal

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the quantum of compensation as excessive

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs.8,57,250/- with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No.2083/2009

Issues

Whether the multiplier of 17 applied by the Tribunal is correct for a deceased aged 50 years? Whether the deduction of 1/3rd towards personal expenses is appropriate when there are 5 dependents?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the multiplier should be 13 as per Sarla Verma and deduction should be 1/4th. Respondents supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased aged 50 years, the multiplier should be 13 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and for 5 dependents, deduction towards personal expenses should be 1/4th.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has applied the multiplier 17, which is contrary to the principles laid down in Sarla Verma's case. For a person aged 50 years, the multiplier is 13. The Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses, but as the deceased had 5 dependents, the deduction should be 1/4th.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MVC No.2083/2009 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.VII, Bijapur, which awarded compensation on 10.08.2011. The Insurance Company appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and Deduction. Tribunal's Award of Rs.8,57,250/- Reduced to Rs.5,36,000/- as Multiplier of 17 for Deceased Aged 50 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute — Civil Nature of Dispute Precludes Criminal Liability. Agreement for Development and Sale of Flats Breached; Court Holds That Mere Breach of Contract Does Not Attract Offences Unde...