High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and No Deduction for Personal Expenses. Insurer's Appeal Partly Allowed as Tribunal Erred in Applying Multiplier 13 Instead of 14 and Failed to Deduct 1/3rd for Personal Expenses Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the insurer, The New India Assurance Co., Ltd., against the judgment and award dated 01/02/2010 passed by the III Additional District Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-IV, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in MVC No.1126/2007. The Tribunal had awarded a compensation of Rs. 17,63,000 with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till deposit for the death of a person in a motor vehicle accident. The insurer sought reduction of compensation on the ground that the award was excessive. The High Court examined the impugned award and found that the Tribunal had applied a multiplier of '13' instead of '14' as per the decision in Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121, given the age of the deceased was 45 years. Additionally, the Tribunal had failed to deduct 1/3rd of the income of the deceased towards personal expenses. The High Court recalculated the loss of dependency by taking the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 4,500, adding 30% towards future prospects (Rs. 1,350), making it Rs. 5,850 per month. After deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses, the monthly loss was Rs. 3,900, annual loss Rs. 46,800, and applying multiplier 14, the total loss of dependency was Rs. 6,55,200. The High Court also awarded Rs. 10,000 for loss of consortium, Rs. 5,000 for loss of estate, and Rs. 5,000 for funeral expenses, totaling Rs. 20,000 under conventional heads. Thus, the total compensation was reduced to Rs. 6,75,200. The appeal was partly allowed, and the award was modified accordingly. The insurer was directed to deposit the reduced amount with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till deposit, and the claimants were entitled to withdraw the same.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Death - Multiplier Method - The Tribunal applied multiplier '13' instead of '14' as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121. The High Court corrected the multiplier to '14' based on the age of the deceased (45 years). (Paras 4-5)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Deduction for Personal Expenses - The Tribunal failed to deduct 1/3rd of the income of the deceased towards personal expenses. The High Court held that 1/3rd must be deducted as per settled law. (Para 5)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Loss of Dependency - Computation - The High Court recalculated loss of dependency as Rs. 4,500 (income) + 30% future prospects = Rs. 5,850, minus 1/3rd personal expenses = Rs. 3,900 per month, annual Rs. 46,800, multiplied by 14 = Rs. 6,55,200. (Para 5)

D) Motor Accident Claims - Conventional Heads - The High Court awarded Rs. 10,000 for loss of consortium, Rs. 5,000 for loss of estate, and Rs. 5,000 for funeral expenses, totaling Rs. 20,000. (Para 5)

E) Motor Accident Claims - Total Compensation - The High Court reduced the total compensation from Rs. 17,63,000 to Rs. 6,75,200 with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till deposit. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper, and whether the Tribunal erred in applying the multiplier and in not deducting personal expenses of the deceased.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The impugned judgment and award dated 01/02/2010 in MVC No.1126/2007 is modified. The total compensation is reduced from Rs. 17,63,000 to Rs. 6,75,200. The insurer is directed to deposit the reduced amount with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till deposit within four weeks. The claimants are entitled to withdraw the same.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Compensation for Death
  • Multiplier Method
  • Deduction for Personal Expenses
  • Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 21

M.F.A. No. 4010 of 2010 (MV)

2013-03-21

N.K. Patil, C.R. Kumaraswamy

Sri. A.K.Bhat (for appellant), Sri. G.Ravishankar Shastry (for respondents 2 to 4)

The New India Assurance Co., Ltd.

K. Ravi, Sandhya.P, Kum. Maithili, K.G. Mayadasi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Reduction of compensation awarded by Tribunal

Filing Reason

Insurer contended that compensation of Rs. 17,63,000 awarded by Tribunal was excessive

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs. 17,63,000 with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No.1126/2007

Issues

Whether the multiplier applied by the Tribunal is correct? Whether the Tribunal erred in not deducting personal expenses of the deceased?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant-Insurer argued that the compensation awarded is excessive and requires reduction. Respondents-claimants supported the award.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims, the multiplier should be applied as per the age of the deceased as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121. For a deceased aged 45 years, the correct multiplier is 14. Further, 1/3rd of the income must be deducted towards personal expenses. Future prospects at 30% should be added to the income.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has applied multiplier '13' instead of '14' as per the decision of the Apex Court in Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121. The Tribunal has not deducted 1/3rd of the income of the deceased towards his personal expenses. Thus, the total compensation is reduced to Rs. 6,75,200.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MVC No.1126/2007 before the III Additional District Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-IV, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, seeking compensation for the death of a person in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 17,63,000 with interest at 6% p.a. on 01/02/2010. The insurer filed M.F.A. No. 4010 of 2010 before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore challenging the award. The High Court partly allowed the appeal on 21/03/2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Set Aside Due to Perversity and Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that the lower appellate court failed to properly re-apprec...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and No Deduction for Personal Expenses. Insurer's Appeal Partly Allowed as Tribunal Erred in Applying Multiplier 13 Instead of 14 and Failed to Deduct 1/3rd ...