Search Results for "mandatory meetings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "mandatory meetings"

655 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 655 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch; Meeting Convened Within Two Days Valid Under 1975 Rules. Special meeting for no-confidence motion under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act and the 1975 Rules does not require three clear days' notice as per Rule 4 of Meetings Rules 1959, and meeting held within seven days is sufficient.

2 Jul 2018

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Kawalgaon, Taluka Degloor, District Nan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Failure to Convene Monthly Meetings — Responsibility Lies with Village Development Officer Under Meeting Rules, Not Sarpanch Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

12 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Salimbi Mubarak Tamboli, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Savargaon (Dere) in 2015, unopposed as the only OBC candidate. The U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

10 Jan 2013

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Disqualification Order Against Woman Sarpanch for Failure to Hold Gram Sabha Meeting on Republic Day. Interpretation of Rule 3(2) of Gram Sabha Rules Indicates Meeting Date Not Mandatory, and Onus on Officials to Guide New Electee.

9 Apr 2025

The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe woman, was directly elected Sarpanch of village Mundgaon on 20.12.2022 and assumed office on 04.01.2023. Respondent ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Validity of Special General Meeting Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Town Panchayat President Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. The court considered precedents to determine if the 10-day notice requirement under Section 42(9) proviso is mandatory or directory.

23 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Smt Damayanthi, was the elected President of Vitla Town Panchayat, having assumed charge on 16.01.2019 after an election. The Town Pan...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4872 OF 2006

25 Sep 2006

...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeal for Non-Compliance of Section 24(3)(c) IBC — Mandatory Notice to Operational Creditor for COC Meetings. Compliance of Section 24(3)(c) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 held mandatory as per Supreme Court judgment in Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority v. Prabhjit Singh Soni.

14 Nov 2024

The case involves an appeal by Binjusaria Ispat Pvt Ltd, an operational creditor of Abhirama Steels Ltd, against an order dated 17.09.2024 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

16 Jul 2012

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)