Search Results for "family requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "family requirement"

3944 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3944 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appellate Court Order and Restores Trial Court Decree in Eviction Suit Based on Bonafide Need of Landlord. Bonafide Requirement Established Through Tenant's Admissions and Landlord's Family Circumstances, Rendering Appellate Court's Reversal Erroneous and Resulting in Miscarriage of Justice.

22 Jul 2005

The dispute concerned a small tenanted room measuring 9 feet by 10 feet in Solapur, with a monthly rent of Rs. 25. The landlord, who had a family of e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Eviction Petition on Ground of Bonafide Requirement for Grandson. Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 interpreted to include requirement of grandson as member of family.

9 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Smt. Yamunabai Kalangauda Patil, a landlady, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Revision in Rent Control Case for Bonafide Requirement. Landlord's need for premises for himself, aged parents, and children held bonafide under Section 31F of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

26 Jun 2006

The case involves four Civil Revision Applications under Section 31F of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, arising fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born After Cut-off Date — Government Resolution Cannot Apply Retrospectively to Employees in Service Before 2001. The court held that the bar on compassionate appointment for having a third child after 31/12/2001 cannot be applied to employees who were already in service before the Government Resolution dated 28/03/2001 came into force.

1 Jul 2024

The petitioner, whose father Hiralal was an Assistant Teacher in Panchayat Samiti, Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur, died in service on 14/03/2009. The peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Family Pension to Mother of Deceased Bachelor Employee Despite Surviving Daughters. The court held that the mother is a dependent entitled to family pension under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Employees Pension Rules, 1979, and rejection on ground of surviving daughters was unjustified.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Surekha Yashwant Pilankar, a 75-year-old mother, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of family pension after her son, a Junio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Family Pension to Mother of Deceased Bachelor Employee Despite Surviving Daughters — Rejection Based on Daughters' Existence Held Unreasonable. The court held that the mother, being the sole dependent of the deceased bachelor employee, is entitled to family pension under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Pension Rules, and the rejection on the ground of surviving daughters was unsustainable.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Surekha Yashwant Pilankar, a 75-year-old widow, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of family pension following the death of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Family Pension to Mother of Deceased Bachelor Employee Despite Surviving Daughters. The court held that the mother, being a dependent, is entitled to family pension under the old pension scheme, and the rejection on the ground of surviving daughters was unsustainable.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Surekha Yashwant Pilankar, a 75-year-old mother, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of family pension after her son, a Junio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Family Pension to Second Wife in Absence of Valid Divorce or Proof of First Marriage Subsisting at Time of Second Marriage — Presumption of Marriage Under Section 114 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applied. The court held that long cohabitation raises a presumption of marriage, and the burden to rebut it lies on the state, which was not discharged.

16 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Smt. Shamal Mahadeo Tate, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking family pension as the second wife of the deceased...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree for Bonafide Requirement in Rent Control Case. Landlords' need for suit premises held genuine despite acquisition of additional rooms under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

14 Jan 2010

The original defendant (petitioner) was a tenant in suit premises consisting of two rooms admeasuring 10 ft X 10 ft and 8 ft X 10 ft. The plaintiffs (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

21 Aug 2015

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)