Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Eviction Petition on Ground of Bonafide Requirement for Grandson. Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 interpreted to include requirement of grandson as member of family.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Yamunabai Kalangauda Patil, a landlady, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 22.10.1991 of the appeal court in Civil Appeal No.361/1989. The appeal court had set aside the eviction decree passed by the trial court in Civil Suit No.1393/1985. The eviction suit was instituted on two grounds: default in payment of rent and bonafide need of the landlady for the demised premises for herself and members of her family. The trial court decreed eviction on both grounds. The appeal court allowed the tenants' appeal and set aside the decree. In the High Court, the landlady's counsel confined arguments to the ground of bonafide requirement. The bonafide requirement was based on the need of Prakash, the son of the landlady's pre-deceased daughter. The relevant provision is Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The High Court held that the grandson is a member of the family and his requirement can be considered as bonafide requirement of the landlady. The appeal court's view that the grandson is not a member of the family was erroneous. The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the appeal court's order, and restored the trial court's eviction decree.

Headnote

A) Rent Control - Bonafide Requirement - Member of Family - Section 13(1)(g) Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - The landlady sought eviction on ground of bonafide requirement for her grandson (son of pre-deceased daughter). The trial court decreed eviction but the appeal court set it aside. The High Court held that the grandson is a member of the family and his requirement can be considered as bonafide requirement of the landlady. The appeal court erred in holding otherwise. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the requirement of a grandson (son of pre-deceased daughter) can be considered as bonafide requirement of the landlady for the use of the demised premises under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Judgment and order of appeal court set aside. Decree of eviction passed by trial court restored.

Law Points

  • Bonafide requirement
  • Member of family
  • Grandson
  • Section 13(1)(g) Bombay Rents Act
  • 1947
  • Eviction decree
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (11) 25

Writ Petition No.2708 of 1992

2006-11-09

D.B. Bhosale

Mrs. Suhasini Mutalik for petitioner, Mr. G.M. Khambate for respondents

Smt. Yamunabai Kalangauda Patil

Smt. Fatimabi Hasanbhai Shaikh and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging appellate court's order setting aside eviction decree.

Remedy Sought

Landlady sought restoration of eviction decree passed by trial court.

Filing Reason

Appeal court set aside eviction decree on ground of bonafide requirement.

Previous Decisions

Trial court decreed eviction on grounds of default in rent and bonafide requirement; appeal court allowed tenants' appeal and set aside decree.

Issues

Whether the requirement of a grandson (son of pre-deceased daughter) can be considered as bonafide requirement of the landlady under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Landlady argued that grandson is a member of family and his requirement is bonafide. Tenants argued that grandson is not a member of family for purpose of Section 13(1)(g).

Ratio Decidendi

A grandson (son of pre-deceased daughter) is a member of the family of the landlady for the purpose of Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, and his requirement can be considered as bonafide requirement of the landlady.

Judgment Excerpts

The case regarding bonafide requirement of the members of family of the landlady is based on the requirement of Prakash, the son of her pre-deceased daughter. The relevant provision under which the decree was sought is section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

Procedural History

Trial court (Civil Suit No.1393/1985) decreed eviction on 23.2.1989. Appeal court (Civil Appeal No.361/1989) set aside decree on 22.10.1991. Landlady filed writ petition under Article 227 in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947: 13(1)(g)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Eviction Petition on Ground of Bonafide Requirement for Grandson. Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 interpreted to include requirement of grandson as member of family...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Proximate Link Between Alleged Cruelty and Suicide. Conviction under Section 306 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Did Not Establish Mens Rea or Direct Instigation.