Search Results for "demand bill"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "demand bill"

1164 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1164 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against MSEB Supplementary Bill for Alleged Meter Tampering - Flying Squad Report Lacks Signature of Consumer or Independent Witness, Rendering It Unreliable. The court held that the supplementary bill of Rs.2,69,059.14 based on an unsigned flying squad report was illegal and set aside the trial court's dismissal of the suit.

7 Mar 2005

The appellant, Kaushik Sandeepan Gaikwad, was running an ice factory in Mohol with a high power LT electric connection of 60 HP from the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supplementary Electricity Bill for 50 Months' Arrears Against Legal Heir Due to Lack of Notice and Limitation. Retrospective Demand for Arrears Beyond Two Years Held Barred Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003, and Change of Meter Without Consumer's Knowledge Vitiated the Demand.

6 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mrs. Veena S. Bajaj, filed a writ petition challenging two electricity bills dated 24th November 2000 and 18th July 2001 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Principal with Reduced Interest in Bill Discounting Dispute — Interest Rate of 18% p.a. Granted from Due Date Instead of Claimed 30% p.a. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to interest at 18% p.a. on the defaulted principal from the due date until suit, and thereafter at 6% p.a. pendente lite and future interest under Section 34 CPC.

20 Mar 2015

The plaintiff, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, filed a summary suit against NEPC Micon Limited for recovery of Rs. 1.06 crores, comprising a principal su...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Order Restricting Electricity Bill to 24 Months in Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Head Master, Anudanit Prathamik Ashram Shala. The Court held that Regulation 6.4 of the MERC Regulations 2006 limits billing to 24 months prior to issuance, and the Forum's order was not perverse.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, challenged an order dated 08.06.2016 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Demand Notice and Rebate Calculation. Dispute Concerns Application of 25% Tariff Rebate Under Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Pursuant to 1999 Judgment

8 Jul 2011

The matter concerns a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a sick industrial unit engaged in steel manufacturing. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CGRF Order in Electricity Bill Dispute — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Correct Application of Multiplying Factor. Court holds that CGRF erred in treating the mistake as non-bonafide and in estimating consumption without proper evidence, directing reconsideration in light of Supreme Court precedent.

21 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 15.11.2022 passed by the Consumer Griev...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute, Interpreting Limitation Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) bars recovery of additional charges from the date the sum first became due, based on billing error, and remanded the case for fresh consideration.

5 Oct 2021

The dispute arose when the appellant, a cotton yarn manufacturer in Panipat, Haryana, received a short assessment notice from the electricity distribu...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Quashes Electricity Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute — Demand Charges Recovery Based on Contract Demand Upheld. The court held that the Ombudsman's direction to revise bills from March 2019 and refund amounts was contrary to Clause 14.11 of the Tariff and the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code and related matters) Regulations, 2005, and that the Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction to review its own order.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, challenged two orders passed by the Electric...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)