Search Results for "bye-law amendment"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Election Process. Court upholds Registrar's approval of bye-law amendment and election schedule, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, The Bank of India Staff Panchsheel Cooperative Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30th Septemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Co-operative Society's Bye-law Amendment for Lack of Quorum. Amendment to Bye-law 26(c) set aside as meeting lacked quorum under Section 75 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, a member of the respondent co-operative housing society, challenged the validity of an amendment to Bye-law 26(c) passed at a general ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment for Lack of Quorum and Procedural Irregularities. Amendment to Bye-Law 24(c) restricting voting rights to one member per family set aside as resolution passed without requisite quorum and without proper notice.

The petitioners, Uday Dalal, Ajay Biyani, Rina Pritish Nandy, and Prachi Agarwal, are members of the Malboro House Coop. Housing Society Limited, a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Appointment of Administrator. Court holds that amendment to bye-laws requiring members to pay additional contribution for non-residential use is ultra vires the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, Balaji Tower Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and Parthasarathy Rangachari, filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to bye-law 28A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment for Non-Compliance with Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) set aside as notice of meeting did not contain proposed amendment.

The petitioner, Sadguru University CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) of the respondent society, Sadguru Premi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Registration of Sub-Lease. Registrar's power to register sub-leases under Section 22 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 upheld.

The petitioner, a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies dated 15.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Non-Joinder of Necessary Party in Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment Dispute. Members Cannot Challenge Cancellation of Bye-Law Amendment Without Impleading the Society Itself.

The petitioners, claiming to be members of a cooperative society named Buldhana Zilla Madhyamik Shikshak Sahakari Pat Sanstha Limited, Buldhana, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...