Search Results for "audio recording"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Declaration in Favor of FM Broadcaster Against Copyright Society. Court Rules That Defendant Cannot Demand Royalty for Broadcast of Sound Recordings Under Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by Music Broadcast Private Limited, a company operating FM radio stations across India, against Indian Performing Right Society Lim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Injunction Application in Copyright Infringement Suit Concerning Digital Music Platform’s Use of Sound Recordings. The Court Examines Defenses of Fair Use and Statutory License Under Sections 52 and 31-D of the Copyright Act, 1957.

The present proceeding arose from two commercial IP suits filed by Tips Industries Ltd. (plaintiff) against Wynk Music Ltd. and another (defendants) b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds that Copyright Society Cannot Demand Royalty for Sound Recording Broadcasts from FM Radio Stations. Sound Recording Copyright Prevails Over Underlying Works Once Incorporated, Thus IPRS Not Entitled to Licence Fee for Broadcasts.

Background: The dispute involved the right of a copyright society (IPRS) to demand royalties from an FM radio broadcaster for broadcasting sound recor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Accused's Appeal for Cloned Copy of Memory Card in Rape Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Victim's Privacy. Electronic Record Held to be 'Document' Under Evidence Act and IPC, Entitling Accused to Copy Under Section 207 CrPC.

The appellant, P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep, was arrayed as accused No. 8 in a case registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to POCSO Court Orders Allowing Victim's Evidence Recording and Denying Audio-Video Copies. Petitioner's Failure to Object at Trial Stage Precludes Later Challenge; Section 35 POCSO Act Irregularity Cured by Consent.

The petitioner, Shubham Vilas Tayade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging two orders passed by the ...