Supreme Court Issues Directions for Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres to Ensure Fair Trial and Dignity Under Article 21. The Court expanded the definition of vulnerable witnesses and mandated High Courts to adopt schemes, set up centres, and establish training committees for recording evidence in criminal cases.

  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed the long-standing issue of creating a safe and barrier-free environment for recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses in criminal trials, emphasizing the need for such facilities over two decades. The Court referenced its earlier decisions in Sakshi v Union of India and State of Maharashtra v Bandu @ Daulat, which had issued directions for protecting vulnerable witnesses, including the use of screens and special centres. In this judgment, the Court noted the fairness of trial and substantive justice depend significantly on how vulnerable witnesses' statements are recorded, linking this to the dignity of person under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court issued notice to all High Courts, and based on material presented, including a tabulated statement of infrastructure as of 25 October 2021, and suggestions from amicus curiae, it issued comprehensive directions under Article 142. These directions include expanding the definition of vulnerable witnesses to include categories such as age and gender neutral victims of sexual assault, witnesses with mental illness, and those under threat perception, adopting and notifying VWDC Schemes by High Courts within two months, setting up permanent VWDCs in every district, establishing a committee chaired by Justice Ms Gita Mittal for training, and coordinating with state governments for funding. The Court directed compliance reports and emphasized the role of National and State Legal Services Authorities in sensitization programs. The decision aims to implement earlier guidelines and ensure a conducive environment for vulnerable witnesses, upholding constitutional rights and access to justice.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Vulnerable Witnesses - Directions for Deposition Centres - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 273, 327; Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 354, 377; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 2(d); Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, Section 2(s); Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118; Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 - The Supreme Court considered the importance of creating a barrier-free environment for vulnerable witnesses in criminal trials, expanding the definition of vulnerable witnesses beyond child witnesses to include age and gender neutral victims of sexual assault, witnesses with mental illness, and others. The Court issued directions under Article 142 of the Constitution for High Courts to adopt and notify VWDC Schemes, set up permanent VWDCs in every district, and establish a committee for training and implementation. Held that these measures are necessary to uphold the dignity of person under Article 21 and ensure fair trial. (Paras 1-5)

B) Constitutional Law - Article 142 - Directions for Implementation - Constitution of India, Article 142 - The Supreme Court exercised its powers under Article 142 to issue directions for the implementation of VWDC Schemes across all High Courts, including the expansion of the definition of vulnerable witnesses, setting up of committees, estimation of costs, and coordination with state governments and legal services authorities. Held that these directions are intended to facilitate the earlier decisions in Sakshi v Union of India and State of Maharashtra v Bandu @ Daulat, ensuring substantive justice and access to justice for vulnerable witnesses. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

The need for setting up facilities to create a safe and barrier-free environment for recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses in criminal cases

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court issued directions under Article 142 of the Constitution for High Courts to adopt and notify Vulnerable Witnesses Deposition Centres (VWDC) Schemes, expand the definition of vulnerable witnesses, set up permanent VWDCs in every district, establish a committee for training, and coordinate with state governments for funding, with compliance reports to be filed.

Law Points

  • Fair trial
  • dignity of person under Article 21 of the Constitution
  • access to justice
  • protection of vulnerable witnesses
  • expansion of definition of vulnerable witnesses
  • implementation of Vulnerable Witnesses Deposition Centres (VWDC) Scheme
  • directions under Article 142 of the Constitution
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 Lawtext (SC) (1) 87

Miscellaneous Application No 1852 of 2019 in Criminal Appeal No 1101 of 2019

2022-01-11

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

Ms Vibha Datta Makhija (amicus curiae)

Smruti Tukaram Badade

State of Maharashtra & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public interest litigation or suo motu proceedings regarding the need for setting up facilities for vulnerable witnesses in criminal trials

Remedy Sought

Directions for creating a safe and barrier-free environment for recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses

Filing Reason

To address the lack of infrastructure and procedures for protecting vulnerable witnesses in criminal cases

Previous Decisions

Directions issued in Sakshi v Union of India and State of Maharashtra v Bandu @ Daulat for protecting vulnerable witnesses, including the use of screens and special centres

Issues

The need for setting up facilities to create a safe and barrier-free environment for recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses in criminal cases

Ratio Decidendi

The fairness of trial and substantive justice depend on the manner in which statements of vulnerable witnesses are recorded, and the dignity of person under Article 21 of the Constitution requires positive steps to create a barrier-free environment, necessitating the expansion of the definition of vulnerable witnesses and the implementation of VWDC Schemes across all High Courts.

Judgment Excerpts

The need for and importance of setting up facilities which cater to the need for creating a safe and barrier free environment for recording the evidence of vulnerable witnesses has engaged the attention of this Court over two decades. The fairness of the process of trial as well as the pursuit of substantive justice are determined in a significant measure by the manner in which statements of vulnerable witnesses are recorded. The dignity of person, which is an intrinsic element of Article 21 of the Constitution, cannot be left to the vagaries of insensitive procedures and a hostile environment.

Procedural History

The Supreme Court issued notice to all High Courts, received material including a tabulated statement of infrastructure as of 25 October 2021, considered suggestions from amicus curiae, and issued directions based on deliberations during proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 273, 327
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 354, 377
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 2(d)
  • Mental Healthcare Act, 2017: 2(s)
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 118
  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 142
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Issues Directions for Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres to Ensure Fair Trial and Dignity Under Article 21. The Court expanded the definition of vulnerable witnesses and mandated High Courts to adopt schemes, set up centres, and esta...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissal of Bank Employee in Industrial Disputes Case Due to Fraudulent Misappropriation. Tribunal's Interference Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Unjustified as Punishment Was Not Shockingly Dispropor...