Search Results for "arbitrator bias"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Petitions Challenging Conflicting Stock Exchange Arbitral Awards. Court Focuses on Whether Same Arbitrator's Contradictory Findings on Identical Facts Vitiated Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Three petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Allegations of Arbitrator Bias in Stamp Duty Compliance Matter. Arbitrator's Visit to Stamp Authorities to Explain Legal Process Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Deemed Part of Statutory Duty and Not Evidence of Partiality.

The petition invoked Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking substitution of the sole arbitrator on the ground that she l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator Disqualification in Multi-State Cooperative Dispute. Failure to Disclose Bias and Withdrawal from Similar Matters Constitutes Grounds for Setting Aside Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, The Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Arbitrator's Failure to Disclose Conflict of Interest. Arbitrator's prior role as counsel for a party in another case raised justifiable doubts about impartiality under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a dispute between Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain and others (appellants) and Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) regar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Remove Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute. Relationship Between Arbitrator and Law Firm Representing Party Does Not Automatically Disqualify Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sheetal Maruti Kurundwade, filed a petition under Section 9 and Sections 12(3) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...