Search Results for "Tata Power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Tata Power"

947 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 947 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Distribution Licensee's Right to Levy Wheeling Charges on 110 kV Feeders — 110 kV HPCL Feeders Held Integral Part of Distribution Network Despite Voltage Level. The Court held that the functional use of the feeders for distribution to a single consumer, HPCL, determines their classification as distribution assets, not merely the voltage level under CEA Regulations, 2010.

3 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between Sai Wardha Power Generation Limited (SWPGL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) on one side, and Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee in Standby Charges Dispute with Another Licensee — Standby Charges Fixed by Government Order and Principles of Agreement Held Binding. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's order that TPC could not recover standby charges beyond Rs.3.5 crores per month from BSES/REL for the 275 MVA facility, as per the Government of Maharashtra's order dated 19.1.1998 and the Principles of Agreement dated 30.1.1998.

2 May 2019

The case involves a dispute between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC), a distribution licensee supplying electricity to the entire city of Mumbai, and Ada...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Jan 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to Actual Supply Period in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Depreciation under Regulation 6.32 of DERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Generation Tariff) Regulations, 2011 cannot be allowed beyond the period of actual supply of electricity to consumers, as consumer interest is paramount under Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

18 Feb 2022

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act to Arbitral Award Concerning Lease Agreement and Income Tax Depreciation Issues.

16 Jul 2013

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tata Power to Implement 220 KV Transmission Line Project Subject to Compliance with Environmental and Forest Laws. The court directed the respondents to allow implementation of the project in public interest, subject to conditions including compensatory afforestation and mangrove protection.

2 Mar 2022

The petitioners, The Tata Power Company Limited and a shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direct...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)