Search Results for "Standing Clearance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Standing Clearance"

289 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 289 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Letters Patent Appeal Filed by Terminated Employees Against Single Judge's Order. Model Standing Orders Dispute: Whether Rule 32 Excludes Clause 4A Protection for Probationers Who Were Initially Trainees.

27 Apr 2026

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which had upheld the termination of...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Conditions Regarding Security Clearance for Foreign Joint Venture Partner. Court Upholds CIDCO's Requirement for Security Clearance Under Clause 3(t) of Notice Inviting Bids, Finding No Illegality or Procedural Impropriety in the Tender Process Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

7 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from tender processes initiated by CIDCO for infrastructure development projects in various town planning schemes. The petition...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Mining Company's Challenge to Stoppage Notice Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Two-Year Mining Period Expired. Lease Deed Executed on 18.04.2022 Permitted Mining for Maximum Two Years or Till Stage II Approval, Whichever Earlier; Court Held That the Stoppage Notice Was Valid and No Interference Warranted.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/S Minera Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., a mining company, challenged a stoppage notice dated 08.04.2024 issued by the Deputy Conservator...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

13 Mar 2023

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Karwar Port Expansion Over SEIAA Authority and Consent Deficiencies. Petitions by Fishermen Associations Raise Category A Project and Pollution Control Compliance Issues Under EIA Notification.

29 Jul 2021

Two public interest litigations were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revocation of Environmental Clearance for Granite Quarrying Near Bannerghatta National Park. Environmental Clearance Restored as Eco-Sensitive Zone Notification dated 11.03.2020 Limits Mining Prohibition to Notified 100-Meter Zone, Not One-Kilometer Buffer.

12 Jul 2021

The petitioner, owner of patta land in Herandyapanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, was granted a work order on 14.01.2016 under Rule 32(1) of the Kar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.

5 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Re-Hearing in PIL on Park Land Encroachment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Undertakings Recorded for Park Development and Slum Rehabilitation Under Karnataka Slum Areas Act; Review Petitions Allowed, Matter Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioner, a federation of residents' welfare associations, filed a public interest litigation in 2006 alleging encroachment on approximately 3 a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.

27 Sep 2018

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee, a society of villagers, challenging permissions granted t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

30 Oct 2015

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)