Search Results for "Shops and Commercial Establishments Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Shops and Commercial Establishments Act"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

5 Jan 2026

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Property Owners Against Attachment Under MPID Act — Property Not Proceeds of Crime. The court held that property owned by third parties not accused cannot be attached merely because the accused was in possession under a leave and licence agreement.

15 Dec 2023

The appellants, Smt. Madhu Deepak Gogri and Mayank Deepak Gogri, are the owners of Shop Nos. 1 and 2 in Prem Bhanu Apartment, Borivali (West). The pro...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

1 Aug 2019

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Medical Establishments under Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 2017. Medical Profession Held to Have Commercial Aspect; Registration Requirement for Nursing Homes with Ten or More Employees is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Clinical Establishments Act.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Dr. Pradeep Arora, a medical practitioner and owner of Arora Hospital in Nagpur, challenged the definition of 'establishment' under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Subsistence Allowance Dispute — Model Standing Orders Applicable to APMC. The court held that the definition of 'industrial or other establishments' under Section 2(ii) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, includes the act of presenting agricultural produce, making the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 applicable to the APMC.

30 Jan 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Nagpur, against the judgment of a Single Judge of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Section 80IB(10) Deduction for Mixed-Use Housing Projects. The court held that prior to 1/4/2005, deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is admissible to housing projects with commercial units, and the limit on commercial area applies prospectively.

22 Feb 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the eligibility ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Restaurant's Challenge to Closing Hours Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Petitioner's Request for Exemption from Section 19(1) Timings Rejected as State Government Lacks Power to Grant Individual Exemptions Beyond Schedule II.

15 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Sardar Refreshments, a restaurant, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the State of Maharashtra to grant it an exemption ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Claim for Overtime Wages by Timekeepers in Railway Workshop under Factories Act read with Bombay Shops and Establishments Act. The Court Held that Section 70 of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, by its Non-Obstante Clause, Extends Overtime Wage Protection to All Factory Employees, Not Just 'Workers' under Section 2(1) of the Factories Act, 1948.

8 May 1959

The dispute arose when timekeepers employed in the time office of the Central Railway Workshop and Factory, Parel, Bombay, filed applications before t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)