Search Results for "Section 268A"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Commission Payment Disallowance Upheld. The court held that the Tribunal's finding that commission agents had not rendered services was based on valid material and sustainable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., is a listed company engaged in manufacturing and sale of RCC pipes, steel pipes, etc. For the assessment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Inaction on GST Registration Cancellation Application — Failure to Consider Application Within Statutory Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles and Developers Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's finding that penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 is not automatic and requires mens rea upheld.

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 29th October 2009 passed ...