Search Results for "Section 106 burden"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 106 burden"

1105 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1105 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Criminal Appeal Against Concurrent Conviction for Murder and Robbery Under IPC. Court Reiterates Principles of Circumstantial Evidence and Juvenile Justice Consequences.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal arising from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 18 September 2009, whi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Upper Tunga Project. Court Examines Challenge to Notifications Issued Under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

28 Apr 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 2026

...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

KAHC020009812016_1

28 Apr 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

10 Jun 2010

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)