Search Results for "Representation disposal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Representation disposal"

2117 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2117 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Directing Revenue Divisional Officer to Consider Representation for Cancellation of Patta. Court Holds that Limitation of Relief Warrants Direction for Disposal on Merits within Twelve Weeks.

19 Mar 2025

The petitioner, A. Nagoorkanni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Correction of Customs Tariff and Retrospective Duty Reduction. Court Holds It Cannot Direct Legislature to Amend Tariff or Give Retrospective Effect Under Article 226; Representation to Be Decided by Revenue Authorities.

7 Jul 2025

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981; Representations and Delay Issues Considered. Court Finds No Merit in Allegation of Non-Forwarding of Representation as Detenu's Son Voluntarily Took Back Copies, While Delay Explanation Was Noted.

5 May 2006

The petitioner-detenu challenged his detention order dated 22.06.2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Displaced Persons Land Allotment Case — CCLA Had Authority to Allot Land as Delegatee of Central Government Under Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. The Court upheld the allotment of 19.26 standard acres to the appellant as balance of verified claim, rejecting the State's challenge on grounds of authority, vesting, and delay.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Ramesh Parsram Malani and others against the State of Telangana and others, setting aside the High Court...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Demolition of Dilapidated Building in Writ of Mandamus. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits Within Three Months Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

6 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Dr. M. Mohammed Ayub, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA — Detention Order Quashed for Non-Consideration of Representation. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's representation before expiry of detention period violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

22 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Dina Shah, wife of the detenu Vipul Vinod Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Constituted Full Bench to Determine Method of Calculation of Quotient for Standing Committee Representation Under Section 31A of Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act. Questions Referred on Whether a Recognized Party Can Nominate Non-Member Councillors and Whether Fractional Entitlements Below 0.5 Must Be Considered.

1 Apr 2010

Background: The dispute concerned the method of constitution of Standing Committees in Municipal Corporations under Section 31A of the Bombay Provinci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Detention Orders in Preventive Detention Case — Government Obligation to Consider Representation Under Article 22(5) Exists Even After Reference to Advisory Board. The Court held that Article 22(5) implicitly requires the appropriate Government to consider a detenu's representation irrespective of the stage of reference to the Advisory Board, and failure to do so vitiates the detention.

1 May 1969

This case arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India filed by several persons detained under the Preventive Detention Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Expeditious Consideration Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The Court held that failure to decide the detenu's representation promptly renders the detention order illegal and directed release.

15 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sangharsh Alias Bhavya Nitin Adsul, challenged an order of detention dated 29th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

30 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)