Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal, Restores Section 37 Arbitration Appeal for Merits Hearing — Award Not to Be Set Aside on Jurisdictional Ground of State Act Applicability Where Objection Was Not Raised at Appropriate Stage.

The appellant, M/s. Modern Builders, was appointed as a contractor by the State of Madhya Pradesh to construct a minor bridge. The contract was rescin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Housing Board Against High Court Order Directing Arbitration Tribunal to Entertain Fresh Claim Despite Prior Arbitral Award. Principle of Issue Estoppel and Finality of Award Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Applied.

The case involves three civil appeals by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a common judgment of the Madhya Prade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of ICADR Arbitral Orders in Private Road Concession Dispute. Core issue involves whether arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and ICADR Rules can be overridden by the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983.

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 13415 of 2025, challenging the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Recovery of Liquidated Damages Pending Arbitral Adjudication. Recovery Proceedings Initiated Without Awaiting Outcome of Arbitral Tribunal Under Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 Are Unjustified.

The appellant, a proprietorship firm registered as a Class 'A' contractor, was awarded two contracts for construction and maintenance of rural roads u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Limited Scope of Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Affirms Modification of Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Per Annum.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...