Search Results for "Heritage Committee"

185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Heritage Market Buildings. Heritage Classification Does Not Bar Demolition for Public Safety Under Section 2(1ea) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.

The petitioners, residents of Mysuru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition by Real Estate Developer Against MCGM's Condition Requiring Heritage Committee NOC for Fort Redevelopment. Developer Challenges Condition 38 as Arbitrary and Discriminatory Under DCPR 2034 Regulation 52.

The case involved a writ petition by a proprietary real estate developer, Shreeji Realty, challenging a condition imposed by the Brihanmumbai Municipa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Preservation of Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple Shivalinga and Temple Structure. Court directs measures to prevent erosion of Shivalinga, including ban on rubbing by devotees, improvement of pH value, reduction of weight of ornaments, and structural assessment by CBRI.

The Supreme Court was monitoring compliance of its earlier judgment in Civil Appeal No. 4676/2018 dated 02.05.2018 concerning the preservation of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...