Search Results for "Food additive"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Safety Case Due to Inconclusive MSG Test. Misbranding Allegation under FSS Act Fails as Laboratory Lacked Facility to Test for Mono Sodium Glutamate, Making Prosecution Unsustainable.

The petitioner, a proprietor of a wholesale distributing agency in APMC Yard, Vijayapura, distributed various products including Sunfeast Yippee! Nood...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Gypsum Board Tax Classification Case. Holds that Gypsum Board Falls Under 'Gypsum in All Its Forms' Entry in Rajasthan VAT Act, Taxable at 4%.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Additional Commissioner (Legal), Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan and another against the judgment of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...