Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

2498 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2498 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit Due to First Appellate Court's Failure to Comply with Order XLI Rule 31 CPC. The First Appellate Court's judgment was set aside for not independently analyzing evidence and not framing points for determination as required under Section 96 and Order XLI Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

13 Sep 2017

The appellant, Rukminibai, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Single Judge Can Hear Petitions Under Article 226/227 Against Any Judicial/Quasi-Judicial Order, Not Limited to Listed Acts. The Full Bench resolves the conflict and clarifies that Rule 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 is procedural and does not restrict the Single Judge's jurisdiction to specific Acts.

4 Oct 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed by M/s. Magnum Opus IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd. under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

24 Apr 2024

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over 'AB' Wall — Remand Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. First Appellate Court Exceeded Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Without Recording Satisfaction That Decree Was Reversed or Set Aside.

16 Feb 2022

The present miscellaneous second appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2013 passed by the Fast...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order Directing Civil Imprisonment for Breach of Temporary Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Lower Court Found That Appellants Violated Injunction by Completing Construction and Creating Third-Party Interests Despite Court Restraints.

9 Mar 2005

This appeal from order arose from a contempt application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The original plaintif...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal from Order Maintainable Against Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Decisions Under Section 71(6) of FSS Act, 2006. The Court ruled that appeals lie to the civil side of the High Court and can be filed as an Appeal from Order under Section 104 CPC read with Order 43 Rule 1.

23 Dec 2022

The State of Maharashtra, through its Food Safety Officer, filed an Appeal from Order before the Bombay High Court challenging a judgment and order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds That Letters Patent Appeal Is Maintainable Against Single Judge Decision in Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of Constitution — Maintainability Depends on Nature of Order, Not Label of Jurisdiction Invoked. The Court Emphasized Liberal Construction of Clause 15 of Letters Patent to Remedy Injustice.

17 Mar 2011

This judgment of a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court addresses the recurring question of whether a Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Lett...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Jun 2017

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal Against Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Liberal Approach to Allowing Amendment for Enhancing Damages After 31 Years Upheld, with Issue of Limitation Kept Open for Trial Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

1 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, where the appellant, Life Insurance Corporation of India,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)