Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petitions of Two Shikshan Sevaks Challenging Termination Without Hearing. Termination Orders Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice, BMC Permitted to Issue Fresh Show Cause Notices and Pass Reasoned Orders Within 60 Days.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 475
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Kishor Sitaram Dongardive and Shrikant Govindrao Vaidya, both appointed as Shikshan Sevaks (primary school teachers) by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) pursuant to an advertisement dated 08/03/2019. The petitioners were selected and joined service on 01/02/2020 and 18/09/2019 respectively. After they submitted documents for verification, the BMC received police character certificates and terminated both petitioners on 17/12/2021 without issuing any show cause notice or granting an opportunity of hearing. The petitioners challenged the termination orders. The court found that the termination was in violation of principles of natural justice as no hearing was given. Additionally, the court noted that Kishor Dongardive had been acquitted in two criminal cases (Sessions Case No. 101 of 2010 and Sessions Trial No. 100 of 2010) and Shrikant Vaidya had no pending criminal cases. The court quashed the termination orders but granted liberty to the BMC to issue fresh show cause notices and pass reasoned orders within 60 days after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The court clarified that the orders are restricted to these petitioners and all contentions are kept open.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - No specific Act cited - Termination of a Shikshan Sevak by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation without issuing a show cause notice or granting an opportunity of hearing was held to be violative of principles of natural justice. The Court quashed the termination order and permitted the Corporation to issue a fresh show cause notice and pass a reasoned order within 60 days. (Paras 4-8, 13-14)

B) Service Law - Recruitment - Police Character Certificate - No specific Act cited - The Court noted that the petitioners had been acquitted in criminal cases or had no pending cases, and the termination based on a police character certificate without hearing was unsustainable. (Paras 5, 12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether termination of employment without issuing a show cause notice and without granting an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are partly allowed. The impugned termination orders dated 17/12/2021 are quashed and set aside with liberty to the Municipal Corporation to issue fresh show cause notices to the petitioners. Reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be granted and a final reasoned order shall be passed within 60 days from the date of service of notice. The petitioners shall cooperate and not avoid service. Rule made partly absolute in both petitions.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • termination without show cause notice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • quashing of termination order
  • liberty to issue fresh notice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (10) 2515

Writ Petition No. 4158 of 2022 and Writ Petition No. 4547 of 2022

2024-10-08

Ravindra V. Ghuge, M. M. Sathaye

2024:BHC-OS:16037-DB

Mr. B. Gopalakrishnan a/w Mr. Nilesh S. Ghadge for Petitioners, Mrs. Shilpa Redkar a/w Mr. Shivprasad Borade for Respondent-MCGM

Kishor Sitaram Dongardive and Shrikant Govindrao Vaidya

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging termination orders of Shikshan Sevaks by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of termination orders and reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were terminated from service without being issued a show cause notice or granted an opportunity of hearing, allegedly based on police character certificates.

Issues

Whether termination of employment without issuing a show cause notice and without granting an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that termination was illegal as no show cause notice or hearing was given, and they had been acquitted in criminal cases or had no pending cases. Respondent Corporation opposed the petitions but could not point out any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing given to the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of an employee without issuing a show cause notice and without granting an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. However, the employer may be permitted to issue a fresh notice and pass a reasoned order after hearing the employee.

Judgment Excerpts

Since Respondent No. 4, received a police character certificate, the Petitioner was terminated on 17/12/2021 without issuing a show cause notice, much less granting an opportunity of hearing. We deem it appropriate to quash the impugned order and at the same time, permit the Municipal Corporation to issue a fresh show cause notice of hearing to the Petitioner, within 15 days from today. The impugned termination order dated 17/12/2021, is quashed and set aside with liberty to the Municipal Corporation to issue a fresh notice of hearing to the Petitioner.

Procedural History

Petitioners were appointed as Shikshan Sevaks in 2019/2020. They were terminated on 17/12/2021 without show cause notice. They filed writ petitions in 2022 challenging the termination. The High Court heard the petitions and delivered judgment on 08/10/2024.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Examine Defence Witnesses in Sessions Case — Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21 Includes Opportunity to Lead Defence Evidence. Rejection of Summons for Defence Witnesses Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justic...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Reservation for Hill and Uttrakhand Areas but Strikes Down Rural Area Reservation in Medical College Admissions. Reservation Based on Place of Residence Violates Article 15(1) Unless It Identifies Socially and Educationally Back...