Madras High Court Division Bench Allows Appeal by Cooperative Society, Upholds Jurisdictional Bar Under Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 in Subsistence Allowance Claim. Application under Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 Not Maintainable for Employee of Cooperative Society as Special Act Prevails Over General Act.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a claim for subsistence allowance by an employee of a cooperative society who was placed under suspension pending criminal, disciplinary, and surcharge proceedings for financial irregularities. The employee, an accountant, approached the Assistant Commissioner of Labour under the Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981, which directed the society to pay Rs. 16,53,795.40 and Rs. 9,06,391 as subsistence allowance. The society challenged this order by way of a writ petition, arguing that the authority under the general Act lacked jurisdiction because the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, being a special Act, governs service conditions of cooperative society employees, and the employee must exhaust remedies under Sections 153 and 154 of that Act. The single judge dismissed the writ petition, prompting the society to file the present writ appeal. The Division Bench analysed the interplay between the special bye-laws of the society, the Co-operative Societies Act, and the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act. It found that Rule 149 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988, and Special Bye-law Clause 31 clearly vested the authority to grant subsistence allowance with the cooperative society's management, though the quantum and procedure were to follow the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act. The Court held that the Co-operative Societies Act, being a special statute, prevails over the general Subsistence Allowance Act, and therefore the application before the labour authority was not maintainable. The Court further observed that Sections 78 and 79 of the Co-operative Societies Act excluded the applicability of the Provident Fund and Gratuity Acts to societies with approved bye-laws, supporting the principle that general labour laws yield to the special cooperative legislation. While recognizing that subsistence allowance is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, as held in Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. V.M.Elango, the Court emphasized that the employee must first approach the society's management and then avail the revisional remedy under Section 153. Accordingly, the Division Bench set aside the single judge's order, allowed the writ appeal, and directed that the employee be at liberty to submit an application to the management, which shall be considered on merits.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Subsistence Allowance - Jurisdiction of Authority under Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 - Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, Rule 149 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988, Special Bye-law Clause 31 - The employee of a cooperative society claimed subsistence allowance before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour under the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act. The Court held that the Co-operative Societies Act is a special Act and prevails over the general Subsistence Allowance Act. Special bye-law Clause 31 provides that subsistence allowance is to be paid as per the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act but the authority to grant rests with the cooperative society's competent authority. Thus, the application before the labour authority was not maintainable, and the employee must approach the cooperative society and then the revisional authority under Section 153. (Paras 7-9, 15)

B) Cooperative Societies - Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies - Remedy under Sections 153 and 154 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act - Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, Sections 153, 154 - The Court observed that the employee must exhaust the statutory remedies provided under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, including approaching the revisional authority under Section 153 and review under Section 154, before seeking judicial intervention. The existence of an alternate remedy under the special Act precludes direct application to other authorities. (Para 9)

C) Cooperative Societies - Applicability of General Labour Laws - Sections 78 and 79 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, Sections 78, 79; Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - The Court noted that Sections 78 and 79 of the Co-operative Societies Act provide that the Provident Fund and Gratuity Acts do not apply to cooperative societies that have approved bye-laws governing these matters. By analogy, the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, being a general law, does not apply when the society's bye-laws provide for subsistence allowance. Thus, the employee cannot invoke the general Act. (Para 10)

D) Constitutional Law - Right to Subsistence Allowance - Article 21 of the Constitution - Constitution of India, Article 21; Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 - The Court referred to a Division Bench judgment in Registrar of Co-operative Societies vs. V.M.Elango, which held that subsistence allowance is a basic right and its denial would violate Article 21. However, the discretion to pay rests with the employer under the bye-laws, which must be exercised reasonably. A total denial without justification is impermissible. The Court directed that if the employee files an application before the management, it must be considered on merits. (Paras 14-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an application for subsistence allowance by an employee of a cooperative society is maintainable before the authority under the Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981, or whether the employee must exhaust remedies under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ appeal allowed; order dated 16.03.2023 in WP No.27379 of 2014 set aside. It was held that the application before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour under the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act is not maintainable. The employee is at liberty to submit an application for subsistence allowance before the management of the cooperative society and then approach the revisional authority under Section 153 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act if aggrieved. No costs.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • Special Act prevails over general Act
  • Co-operative Societies Act is special law
  • Subsistence Allowance Act is general law
  • Bye-law 31(2) governs subsistence allowance
  • Exhaustion of statutory remedies under Sections 153 and 154 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act
  • EPF and Gratuity Acts inapplicable to cooperative societies with approved bye-laws
  • Subsistence allowance is fundamental right under Article 21
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 128

WA No. 1901 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.16925 of 2026

2026-07-16

S. M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar

Citation not available, 2026:MHC:3029

S. Sadasharam, C. Prakasam

Special Officer, Z-156, Palayapalayam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society

T. Mohan, The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Trichy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against single judge order dismissing writ petition challenging order of authority under Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (Cooperative Society) sought to set aside the writ order and allow the writ petition, thereby quashing the direction to pay subsistence allowance.

Filing Reason

The cooperative society contended that the authority under the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act lacked jurisdiction and the employee should exhaust remedies under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.

Previous Decisions

The first respondent/workman filed an application before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Authority under Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act), which directed payment of Rs.16,53,795.40 and Rs.9,06,391. The society challenged this in WP No.27379 of 2014, which was dismissed on 16.03.2023, leading to the present writ appeal.

Issues

Whether application under Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 by employee of cooperative society is maintainable given the provisions of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 and special bye-laws? Whether the employee should exhaust statutory remedies under the Co-operative Societies Act before approaching the labour authority or court.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the application before the authority under Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act is not maintainable because the Co-operative Societies Act is a special Act prevailing over the general Act, and the employee must exhaust remedies under the Co-operative Societies Act. Appellant also contended that disciplinary and surcharge proceedings were initiated against the employee, and there is an alternate remedy under the Co-operative Societies Act. Respondent/workman argued that subsistence allowance is a basic right, and the special bye-laws provide for payment under the Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, and there is no infirmity in approaching the labour authority.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 is a special Act governing cooperative societies, and its provisions, including the special bye-laws, prevail over the general Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981. Therefore, an employee of a cooperative society must seek subsistence allowance from the society's management as per the bye-laws and exhaust statutory remedies under the Co-operative Societies Act, not approach the authority under the general Subsistence Allowance Act.

Judgment Excerpts

the Special Act will prevail over the general law. In the present case, Co-operative Societies Act is a Special Act and Subsistence Allowance Act is a general law. the authority under the Subsistence Allowance Act has no jurisdiction to deal with the application of an employee of Co-operative Society seeking subsistence allowance. A total denial of Subsistence Allowance to a suspended Employee, in our opinion, would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India

Procedural History

The first respondent employed as accountant in appellant society was placed under suspension and faced criminal, disciplinary, and surcharge proceedings. He filed a claim for subsistence allowance before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour under the Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981, which passed an order directing payment of Rs. 16,53,795.40 and Rs. 9,06,391. The society challenged this order in WP No.27379 of 2014 before the High Court. By order dated 16.03.2023, the single judge dismissed the writ petition. The society then filed the present writ appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981:
  • Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983: 78, 79, 87, 153, 154, 167
  • Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988: Rule 149
  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Lays Down Pan-India Guidelines Against Demolition of Properties of Accused Without Due Process. Executive Cannot Use Demolition as Punishment for Crime; Right to Shelter Protected Under Article 21.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 11 of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 and Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as ...