Search Results for "surcharge proceedings"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Surcharge Notice in Co-operative Society Dispute Due to Procedural Lapse. Deputy Registrar Failed to Order Separate Investigation as Mandated by Circular Before Initiating Surcharge Proceedings Under Sections 81, 82, and 87 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.

The dispute arose from surcharge proceedings initiated against a field officer of the Tiruvannamalai District Central Co-operative Bank. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The court quashed reassessment and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that valid declaration under the Scheme grants immunity.

The petitioners, Umesh D. Ganore and Mangesh D. Ganore, filed two writ petitions challenging the decision of the Revenue Authority in not accepting th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KAT Order in Service Matter — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Grounds for Interference Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Veeranna Basappa Yallali, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...