High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim by Correcting Multiplier from 18 to 16 for Deceased Aged 26 Years. Tribunal's award of Rs.4,65,000 reduced to Rs.4,47,000 as per Sarla Verma guidelines.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The accident occurred on 23.03.2011 when a KSRTC bus driven by Shivanand Badiger hit a pedestrian, Suresh, who died on the spot. The claimants, parents and siblings of the deceased, filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the MACT, Gulbarga. The Tribunal awarded Rs.4,65,000 with interest at 6% p.a., calculating the loss of dependency using a notional income of Rs.4,500 per month, multiplier 18, and deducting 50% for personal expenses. The NEKRTC appealed (MFA 30819/2012) challenging the multiplier and quantum, while the claimants appealed (MFA 32476/2012) seeking enhancement. The High Court held that for a deceased aged 26 years, the correct multiplier is 16 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121, and recalculated the loss of dependency as Rs.4,32,000 (Rs.4,500 x 12 x 16 x 50%). Adding Rs.5,000 for funeral expenses and Rs.10,000 for loss of estate, the total compensation was reduced to Rs.4,47,000. The interest rate of 6% p.a. was maintained. The NEKRTC's appeal was partly allowed, and the claimants' appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Computation of Compensation - Multiplier - For a deceased aged 26 years, the appropriate multiplier is 16 as per the decision in Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121 - The Tribunal's use of multiplier 18 was erroneous and corrected by the High Court (Paras 8-10).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Deduction for Personal Expenses - Where the deceased is a bachelor, deduction of 50% towards personal and living expenses is proper - The Tribunal correctly deducted 50% (Para 9).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Interest Rate - Award of interest at 6% per annum is reasonable and not interfered with (Para 11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier 18 instead of 16 for a deceased aged 26 years, and whether the compensation awarded is just and proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

MFA No. 30819/2012 is partly allowed; the compensation is reduced from Rs.4,65,000 to Rs.4,47,000 with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till deposit. MFA No. 32476/2012 is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Computation of Compensation
  • Multiplier as per Sarla Verma v. DTC
  • Deduction for Personal Expenses
  • Interest Rate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (03) 69

MFA No. 30819 of 2012 (MV) and MFA No. 32476 of 2012 (MV)

2014-03-07

A.S. Pachhapure

Sri. Santhosh Biradar, Sri B.Ali Mohammed

The Managing Director, NKERTC, Central Office, Gulbarga (in MFA 30819/2012); Pattu @ Fattu and others (in MFA 32476/2012)

Pattu @ Fattu and others (in MFA 30819/2012); Shivanand S/o Narayanappa Badiger and The Managing Director, NKERTC (in MFA 32476/2012)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for death in a motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

NEKRTC sought reduction of compensation; claimants sought enhancement of compensation.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal awarded Rs.4,65,000 with interest at 6% p.a. for the death of Suresh in a road accident. Both parties appealed.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded compensation of Rs.4,65,000 with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No.279/2011 dated 28.01.2012.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier 18 instead of 16 for a deceased aged 26 years? Whether the compensation awarded is just and proper?

Submissions/Arguments

NEKRTC argued that the multiplier should be 16 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and that the compensation is excessive. Claimants argued that the compensation is inadequate and sought enhancement.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased aged 26 years, the appropriate multiplier is 16 as per the decision in Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121. The Tribunal's use of multiplier 18 was erroneous and corrected.

Judgment Excerpts

The multiplier applicable for the age group of 26 to 30 years is 17, but for a deceased aged 26 years, the multiplier is 16 as per Sarla Verma. The loss of dependency is recalculated as Rs.4,32,000 (Rs.4,500 x 12 x 16 x 50%).

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed before the MACT, Gulbarga, which awarded compensation on 28.01.2012. Both parties appealed to the High Court under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1), Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim by Correcting Multiplier from 18 to 16 for Deceased Aged 26 Years. Tribunal's award of Rs.4,65,000 reduced to Rs.4,47,000 as per Sarla Verma guidelines.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Students to Pursue BAMS Course Despite NEET Score Deficiency Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Court directs Maharashtra State to grant admission to petitioners who missed NEET cutoff by narrow margin, invoking extraordinary circumst...