Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Gift Deed Not Challenged, No Cause of Action for Partition. Suit for partition without seeking cancellation of registered gift deed is not maintainable under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 158
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a dispute between two real brothers over a house property. The respondent (original plaintiff) and appellant (original defendant) jointly purchased a property in 2008. In 2014, the respondent executed a registered gift deed transferring his share to the appellant. A correction deed followed in 2015. Later, the respondent claimed the transfer was nominal and for loan purposes, and that the appellant agreed to re-transfer via a memorandum of understanding. When the appellant refused, the respondent filed a suit for partition, possession, and injunction without challenging the gift deed. The appellant moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint, which the trial court allowed. The lower appellate court reversed that order, leading to this appeal. The High Court framed a substantial question of law: whether a cause of action for partition exists when the gift deed is not challenged. The court analyzed the plaint and found that the respondent admitted the gift deed was registered and did not seek its cancellation. The court held that the gift deed extinguished the respondent's title, and without setting it aside, no partition is possible. The court also noted that the memorandum of understanding was not a registered document and could not override the gift deed. The court concluded that the plaint disclosed no cause of action and was liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC. The appeal was allowed, the lower appellate court's order was set aside, and the trial court's order rejecting the plaint was restored.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure Code - Order 7 Rule 11 - Rejection of Plaint - Cause of Action - Partition Suit - The plaintiff sought partition of property without challenging a registered gift deed in favour of the defendant - The court held that the suit is not maintainable as the plaintiff's title is extinguished by the gift deed and no cause of action arises unless the deed is set aside - Held that the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC (Paras 2, 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there was any cause of action to seek partition of the suit property when admittedly the registered gift deed executed in favour of defendant is not challenged?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The judgment and decree dated 04.03.2021 passed by the lower appellate Court is set aside. The order dated 24.02.2020 passed by the Trial Court rejecting the plaint is restored. Pending civil application is disposed of.

Law Points

  • Cause of action
  • Order 7 Rule 11 CPC
  • Partition suit
  • Registered gift deed
  • Declaration of title
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 134

Appeal From Order No. 40 of 2021 with Civil Application No. 2529 of 2023

2025-10-04

Shailesh P. Brahme, J.

Mr. Anil S. Bajaj, Mr. Anand P. Bhandari

Deelipkumar Sagarmal Saboo

Ramavtar Sagarmal Saboo

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against order of lower appellate court reversing rejection of plaint in a partition suit.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (original defendant) sought rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Filing Reason

Respondent filed suit for partition, possession and injunction without challenging registered gift deed in favour of appellant.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court allowed application Exh. 16 and rejected plaint on 24.02.2020; Lower Appellate Court reversed that order on 04.03.2021 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59/2020.

Issues

Whether there was any cause of action to seek partition of the suit property when the registered gift deed executed in favour of defendant is not challenged?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the gift deed was executed consciously and registered, and without challenging it, the suit for partition is not maintainable and barred by limitation. Respondent argued that the gift deed was nominal and for loan purposes, and the appellant agreed to re-transfer; thus the suit is maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

A suit for partition without seeking cancellation of a registered gift deed is not maintainable as the plaintiff's title is extinguished by the deed, and no cause of action arises unless the deed is set aside. The plaint is liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether there was any cause of action to seek partition of the suit property when admittedly the registered gift deed executed in favour of defendant is not challenged? The plaint does not disclose any cause of action for partition unless the gift deed is set aside.

Procedural History

Respondent filed Spl. Civil Suit No. 109/2019 for partition, possession and injunction. Appellant filed application Exh. 16 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Trial Court allowed the application on 24.02.2020 and rejected the plaint. Respondent appealed to lower appellate Court which reversed the order on 04.03.2021 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59/2020. Appellant then filed the present appeal before the High Court, which was admitted on 17.02.2023 on the substantial question of law.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order 7 Rule 11 (a) and (d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Gift Deed Not Challenged, No Cause of Action for Partition. Suit for partition without seeking cancellation of registered gift deed is not maintainable under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Income Assessment and Negligence Apportionment. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.11,82,000 to Rs.23,38,000 by reassessing the deceased's income at Rs.15,000 per month...