Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Rectification of Typographical Error in Land Acquisition Documents - Co-operative Housing Society Sought Correction of CTS Number in Gazette Notification and Award. Court Held That Clerical Mistake in Land Acquisition Notification and Award Can Be Corrected Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rain Basera SRA CHS Limited, a Co-operative Housing Society, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the Respondent No. 2 (the State authority) to rectify a typographical error in the Land Acquisition Gazette Notification dated 09.02.1973 and the Land Acquisition Award dated 14.06.1975. The error pertained to the mention of CTS No. 611 instead of the correct CTS No. 699. The property in question, CTS No. 611 admeasuring 438.50 sq. meters, is situated at Village-Malad (East), Taluka-Malad, District-Mumbai Suburban. The background of the case involved the acquisition of private land for the 'Goregaon-Mulund Link Road' project. On 19.03.1971, the Superintendent Engineer, Road Development Department requested the Additional Collector, Mumbai Suburban District to initiate acquisition proceedings. On 12.04.1971, the Additional Collector referred the matter to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Highway, for commencing acquisition. A joint survey was conducted by the Deputy Engineer, Road Development, and Land Surveyor, District Superintendent of Land Records, Mumbai Suburban. The petitioner argued that a typographical error had crept into the notification and award, wrongly mentioning CTS No. 611 instead of CTS No. 699. The court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner, the State, and Respondent No. 4, found that the error was apparent on the face of the record. The court directed the respondents to rectify the error within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Rectification of Typographical Error - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Petitioner sought correction of CTS No. 611 to CTS No. 699 in the Gazette Notification dated 09.02.1973 and Award dated 14.06.1975 - Court held that the error was apparent on the face of the record and directed the respondents to rectify the same within a specified period - Held that the High Court can exercise its writ jurisdiction to correct clerical mistakes in land acquisition documents (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court can direct rectification of a typographical error in a land acquisition gazette notification and award where the wrong CTS number was mentioned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to rectify the typographical error in the Land Acquisition Gazette Notification dated 09.02.1973 and the Land Acquisition Award dated 14.06.1975, by correcting CTS No. 611 to CTS No. 699, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Rectification of typographical error in land acquisition documents
  • Power of High Court under Article 226 to correct clerical mistakes
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 66

Writ Petition No. 2304 of 2026

2026-07-07

Manish Pitale, Shreeram Shirsat

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Mr. Aditya Shirke, Mr. Vikrant Parshurami, Mr. Vikramji Garewal, Ms. Disha Shetty

Rain Basera SRA CHS Limited

The State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking rectification of typographical error in land acquisition documents.

Remedy Sought

Directions to Respondent No. 2 to rectify/correct typographical error in Land Acquisition Gazette Notification dated 09.02.1973 and Land Acquisition Award dated 14.06.1975, where CTS No. 611 was wrongly mentioned instead of CTS No. 699.

Filing Reason

Typographical error in official land acquisition documents regarding CTS number.

Issues

Whether the High Court can direct rectification of a typographical error in a land acquisition gazette notification and award.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that the property CTS No. 611 admeasuring 438.50 sq. meters is situated at Village-Malad (East), Taluka-Malad, District-Mumbai Suburban. On 19.03.1971, the Superintendent Engineer, Road Development Department requested the Additional Collector to initiate acquisition for Goregaon-Mulund Link Road. On 12.04.1971, the Additional Collector referred the matter to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Highway. A joint survey was carried out. The error in the notification and award is typographical.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, can direct the rectification of a typographical error in land acquisition documents when the error is apparent on the face of the record.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner, which is a Co-operative Housing Society, is seeking directions to the Respondent No.2 for rectifying/correcting a typographical error that has crept in the Land Acquisition Gazette Notification dated 09.02.1973 and in the Land Acquisition Award dated 14.06.1975, wherein a land bearing CTS No. 611 is wrongly mentioned instead of CTS No. 699.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 2304 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court seeking rectification of typographical error in land acquisition documents. The court heard the matter and disposed it on 07.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Rectification of Typographical Error in Land Acquisition Documents - Co-operative Housing Society Sought Correction of CTS Number in Gazette Notification and Award. Court Held That Clerical Mistake in Land Acquis...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Appeal as Infructuous in Motor Accident Claim Due to Prior Coordinate Bench Decision on Negligence. Controversy settled in First Appeal No.413/2022 upholding Tribunal's finding on negligence.