Search Results for "typographical error"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Interlocutory Order in Cheque Dishonour Case — Typographical Error Correction Upheld. Order Allowing Amendment to Correct Cheque Number in Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is Interlocutory and Not Revisable Under Section 397 CrPC.

The applicant, Digambar Ganpat Korde, filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 16.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Inclusion in MPSC Merit List Based on Domicile Certificate — Petitioner Failed to Produce Domicile Certificate Before Cut-Off Date, No Right to Claim Inclusion After Deadline

The petitioner, Mr. Sharad Bajirao Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking a direction to the Maharashtra Public...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Against Maintenance Order Under Domestic Violence Act — Interim Maintenance Cannot Be Granted Without Notice. Order Passed Without Notice Violates Natural Justice; Correction Under Section 465 CrPC Cannot Supply Missing Substantive Part.

The petitioner, Syed Naim, husband of respondent No.1, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Bank Guarantee Validity - High Court's Direction to Substitute Bank Guarantee Set Aside as Appellant Complied with Original Order for Scheduled Bank Located in India Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation against Pow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...